Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 290

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Comprehensive Review of Prehospital and In-Hospital Delay Times in Acute Stroke Care

Open access
Evenson, K. R., Foraker, R. E., Morris, D. L., Rosamond, W. D.·2009·International Journal of Stroke

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically review and summarize prehospital and in-hospital stroke evaluation and treatment delay times. We identified 123 unique peer-reviewed studies published from 1981 to 2007 of prehospital and in-hospital delay time for evaluation and treatment of patients with stroke, transient ischemic attack, or stroke-like symptoms. Based on studies of 65 different population groups, the weighted Poisson regression indicated a 6·0% annual decline ( P<0·001) in hours/year for prehospital delay, defined from symptom onset to emergency department arrival. For in-hospital delay, the weighted Poisson regression models indicated no meaningful changes in delay time from emergency department arrival to emergency department evaluation (3·1%, P=0·49 based on 12 population groups). There was a 10·2% annual decline in hours/year from emergency department arrival to neurology evaluation or notification ( P=0·23 based on 16 population groups) and a 10·7% annual decline in hours/year for delay time from emergency department arrival to initiation of computed tomography ( P=0·11 based on 23 population groups). Only one study reported on times from arrival to computed tomography scan interpretation, two studies on arrival to drug administration, and no studies on arrival to transfer to an in-patient setting, precluding generalizations. Prehospital delay continues to contribute the largest proportion of delay time. The next decade provides opportunities to establish more effective community-based interventions worldwide. It will be crucial to have effective stroke surveillance systems in place to better understand and improve both prehospital and in-hospital delays for acute stroke care.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00276.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 290

Metadata

Authors
Evenson, K. R., Foraker, R. E., Morris, D. L., & Rosamond, W. D.
Venue
International Journal of Stroke
Published
2009-06
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
187-199
ISSN
  • 1747-4930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-4949
OpenAlex
W2002373253
Cited by
290
References
71
FWCI
9.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Review of Prehospital and In-Hospital Delay Times in Acute Stroke Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00276.x
The paper
Evenson, K. R., Foraker, R. E., Morris, D. L., & Rosamond, W. D. (2009). A Comprehensive Review of Prehospital and In-Hospital Delay Times in Acute Stroke Care. International Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00276.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.