Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Estimation of Catechol Amines in Urine

EULER, U. S. V., LISHAJKO, F.·1959·Acta Physiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Abstract.: Some modifications in the fluorimetric method of E uler and F loding are described. The urine sample, usually 25 ml, is adjusted to pH 8.2–8.3 and passed through a column of aluminium oxide. The catechols are eluted with acetic acid, neutralized with ammonia to pH 6.2–6.3, oxidized with potassium ferricyanide and transformed to stable lutines with alkali and ascorbic acid. The fluorescence of the lutines is read with two filter sets and the amounts of adrenaline and noradrenaline computed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1959.tb01684.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
EULER, U. S. V., & LISHAJKO, F.
Venue
Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1959-04
Volume
45
Issue
2-3
Pages
122-132
ISSN
  • 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-201X
OpenAlex
W2118473548
Cited by
355
References
3
FWCI
54.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Estimation of Catechol Amines in Urine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1959.tb01684.x
The paper
EULER, U. S. V., & LISHAJKO, F. (1959). The Estimation of Catechol Amines in Urine. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1959.tb01684.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.