The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running
Abstract
In this study the variation in ground reaction force parameters was investigated with respect to adaptations to speed and mode of progression, and to type of foot‐strike. Twelve healthy male subjects were studied during walking (1.0–3.0 m s‐1) and running (1.5–6.0 m s‐1). The subjects were selected with respect to foot‐strike pattern during running. Six subjects were classified as rearfoot strikers and six as forefoot strikers. Constant speeds were accomplished by pacer lights beside an indoor straightway and controlled by means of a photo‐electronic device. The vertical, anteroposterior and mediolateral force components were recorded with a force platform. Computer software was used to calculate durations, amplitudes and impulses of the reaction forces. The amplitudes were normalized with respect to body weight (b.w.). Increased speed was accompanied by shorter force periods and larger peak forces. The peak amplitude of the vertical reaction force in walking and running increased with speed from approximately 1.0 to 1.5 b.w. and 2.0 to 2.9 b.w. respectively. The anteroposterior peak force and mediolateral peak‐to‐peak force increased about 2 times with speed in walking and about 2–4 times in running (the absolute values were on average about 10 times smaller than the vertical). The transition from walking to running resulted in a shorter support phase duration and a change in the shape of the vertical reaction force curve. The vertical peak force increased whereas the vertical impulse and the anteroposterior impulses and peak forces decreased. In running the vertical force showed an impact peak at touch‐down among the rearfoot strikers but generally not among the forefoot strikers. The first mediolateral force peak was laterally directed (as in walking) for the rearfoot strikers but medially for the forefoot strikers. Thus, there is a change with speed in the complex interaction between vertical and horizontal forces needed for propulsion and equilibrium during human locomotion. The differences present between walking and running are consequences of fundamental differences in motor strategies between the two major forms of human progression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors
Sasaki, J. E., John, D., & Freedson, P. S. (2011) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003 · Cited by 1,317
Generalized N-Dimensional Biomechanical Field Analysis Using Statistical Parametric Mapping
Pataky, T. C. (2010) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.008 · Cited by 907
Running in the real world: adjusting leg stiffness for different surfaces
Ferris, D. P., Louie, M., & Farley, C. T. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0388 · Cited by 594
Additive effects of weight-bearing exercise and estrogen on bone mineral density in older women
Kohrt, W. M., Snead, D. B., Slatopolsky, E., & Birge, S. J. (1995) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650100906 · Cited by 310
Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking
Gottschall, J. S., & Kram, R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00670.2002 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- NILSSON, J., & THORSTENSSON, A.
- Venue
- Acta Physiologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-06
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 217-227
- ISSN
- 0001-6772 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-201X
- OpenAlex
- W2026736881
- Cited by
- 697
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08655.x
- The paper
- NILSSON, J., & THORSTENSSON, A. (1989). Ground reaction forces at different speeds of human walking and running. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1989.tb08655.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.