The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators
Abstract
The more a government is effective and fair, the more legitimacy that government is likely to attain, and the more it will possess the potential to elicit compliance without excessive monitoring or punitive action. We explore this proposition using contemporary survey data from sub‐Saharan Africa. In particular, we are interested in the conditions that promote popular legitimating beliefs that provide support for governments that are attempting to serve their entire populations competently and in a manner that is relatively impartial and equitable. This article provides empirical support for a long hypothesized link between the extent of government effectiveness, procedural justice, and citizens' willingness to defer to governmental tax authority. The sample, drawn from a continuum of developing societies in Africa, allows us to analyze the impact of variations in government effectiveness and citizen perceptions of fairness on the sense of obligation to comply with the tax authorities, our indicator for legitimating beliefs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tyler, T. R. (2006) · doi:10.1515/9781400828609 · Cited by 5,156
Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?
Rodrik, D. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250038 · Cited by 3,152
Understanding the process of economic change
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-5988 · Cited by 2,771
Understanding the Process of Economic Change
North, D. C. (2005) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400829484 · Cited by 2,758
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
Tyler, T. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038 · Cited by 2,381
Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate
Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195070705.001.0001 · Cited by 2,324
(2002) · Cited by 1,687
Levi, M. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520909540 · Cited by 1,653
Self-citationLegitimacy and Authority in International Politics
Hurd, I. (1999) · International Organization · doi:10.1162/002081899550913 · Cited by 1,619
POSNER, D. N. (2004) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055404041334 · Cited by 940 · cited 1×
“Across Africa, ethnicity plays a highly salient role in the allocation of public goods (Bates 1983, 152; Kasfir 1979; Posner 2004).”
Background
Cited by
Schoon, E. W. (2022) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224221081379 · Cited by 143
CORRUPTION AND TRUST IN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS IN SUB- SAHARAN AFRICA
(2008) · HAL · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Levi, M., & Sacks, A.
- Venue
- Regulation & Governance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 311-333
- ISSN
- 1748-5983 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-5991
- OpenAlex
- W1972235182
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 74
- FWCI
- 14.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01066.x
- The paper
- Levi, M., & Sacks, A. (2009). Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators. Regulation & Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01066.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.