Cited by 622Sex and Gender in HealthcareDiversity and Career in MedicinePain Management and Opioid Use

The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias against Women in the Treatment of Pain

Hoffmann, Diane E., Tarzian, Anita J.·2001·Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Abstract

To the woman, God said, “I will greatly multiply your pain in child bearing; in pain you shall bring forth children, yet your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.” Genesis 3:16 There is now a well-established body of literature documenting the pervasive inadequate treatment of pain in this country. There have also been allegations, and some data, supporting the notion that women are more likely than men to be undertreated or inappropriately diagnosed and treated for their pain. One particularly troublesome study indicated that women are more likely to be given sedatives for their pain and men to be given pain medication. Speculation as to why this difference might exist has included the following: Women complain more than men; women are not accurate reporters of their pain; men are more stoic so that when they do complain of pain, “it's real”; and women are better able to tolerate pain or have better coping skills than men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2001.tb00037.x

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffmann, D. E., & Tarzian, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Published
2001
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
13-27
ISSN
  • 1073-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-720X
OpenAlex
W2165895019
Cited by
622
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons at University of Maryland Carey Law (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law) (submittedVersion)
Funders
MAYDAY Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
undertreatment of pain, gender bias in medicine, women's pain, pain diagnosis, pain medication prescribing, pain reporting, pain tolerance, coping strategies
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Palliative Care, Prejudice, Sex Factors, United States, Women's Health, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review