The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SOME RAPID APPROXIMATE STATISTICAL PROCEDURES
Open accessAbstract
The last twenty years have seen a great increase in the use of statistical methods in various branches of science and technology. One of the obstacles to the more widespread use of these methods is the complex and laborious nature of the computations which are often required in order to make use of the customary textbook methods. It is not always realized that rapid approximate methods are available for many situations.4 Such approximate methods, however, sacrifice some of the information contained in the data. The purpose here is to describe a few of these methods which have been used by experimentalists in biological and physical research. Signi$canceof Differences. Many experiments are designed to test whether one category differs from another in regard to some measurable quantity. These categories may be, for example: the tensile strength of two types of metal or plastic; the effect of a proposed drug or treatment compared with one now in use; or the comparison of the effect of two fertilizer mixtures on the yield of a certain crop. In all such cases the logic underlying the experiment is usually the same. The assumption is made that the two categories (materials, drugs, or fertilizers) do not differ. An experiment is performed leading to a set of replicated measurements under each category. A statistical constant is calculated from the results, and the probability of obtaining a value as large or larger than that obtained is used as a guide in accepting or rejecting the original assumption. If this probability is sufkiently small, the hypothesis that the two materials are the same is abandoned and a decision is reached that they are different. The particular probability level a t which the hypothesis is abandoned is, of course, a matter of choice, and is determined in part by the seriousness of the consequences should a wrong decision be made, the time and expense involved in the experiments, etc. Efficient statistical tests are described in current textbooks, but these tests often require considerable computation. The tests to be described here are quite simple but often adequate for the purpose in view. Tests Based on Rank Vumbers. An example from entomological work will serve to illustrate these methods. Two household fly sprays had been tested on houseflies, and the tests were replicated eight times for each material. The results obtained, expressed as per cent mortality of the houseflies, are shown in TABLE 1. The average per cent mortality for sample A is 67.7 per cent, while for sample B it is 61.7 per cent. The question to be decided is whether these results indicate a superiority of sample A over sample B? or whether the results are merely due to chance fluctuations and would not hold true in the long run. We may assign rank numbers 1 to 16 to the 16 results in order of magni-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Self-citationThe use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance
Friedman, M. (1937) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1937.10503522 · Cited by 7,005
Cited by
Short-term retention of individual verbal items.
Peterson, L., & Peterson, M. J. (1959) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0049234 · Cited by 2,939
Cross tolerance between LSD and psilocybin
Isbell, H., Wolbach, A. B., Wikler, A., & Miner, E. J. (1961) · Psychopharmacologia · doi:10.1007/bf00407974 · Cited by 137
Masculine Bias in the Attribution of Personhood: People = Male, Male = People
Hamilton, M. C. (1991) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00415.x · Cited by 120
Understanding semi-structured merge conflict characteristics in open-source Java projects
Accioly, P., Borba, P., & Cavalcanti, G. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-017-9586-1 · Cited by 48
Kim, H.-J., Shin, J.-H., Han, C. E., Kim, H. J., Na, D. L., Seo, S. W., & Seong, J.-K. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00394 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilcoxon, F.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1950-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 808-814
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2030096042
- Cited by
- 1,200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SOME RAPID APPROXIMATE STATISTICAL PROCEDURES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1950.tb53974.x
- The paper
- Wilcoxon, F. (1950). SOME RAPID APPROXIMATE STATISTICAL PROCEDURES. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1950.tb53974.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.