Cited by 179Neuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyRegulation of Appetite and ObesityNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Comparative Distribution of Cholecystokinin and Other Neuropeptides: Why is This Peptide Different from All Other Peptides?

CRAWLEY, JACQUELINE N.·1985·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1985.tb29900.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CRAWLEY, J. N.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
CRAWLEY, JACQUELINE N.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-07
Volume
448
Issue
1
Pages
1-8
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1533836102
Cited by
179
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
cholecystokinin, neuropeptides, neuropeptide distribution
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Chemistry, Cholecystokinin, Humans, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Spinal Cord

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review