Cited by 37Schizophrenia research and treatmentMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Disrupted and Undisruptable Latent Inhibition following Shell and Core Lesions

WEINER, I., GAL, G., FELDON, J.·1999·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09310.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WEINER, I., GAL, G., & FELDON, J.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
WEINER, I.
ORCID
GAL, G.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-06
Volume
877
Issue
1
Pages
723-727
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2050517930
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
latent inhibition, frontal lobe lesions, frontal cortex, inhibitory control, frontal lobe dysfunction
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Electroshock, Functional Laterality, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review