Cited by 44Gastrointestinal motility and disordersBarrier Structure and Function StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Stress‐Induced Decrease of the Intestinal Barrier Function: The Role of Muscarinic Receptor Activation

GROOT, JACK, BIJLSMA, PIETER, KALKEREN, ANNETTE VAN, KILIAAN, AMANDA, SAUNDERS, PAUL, PERDUE, MARY·2000·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract:Recently the breakdown of the barrier function of the intestinal epithelium after application of an experimental psychological and physical stress protocol in rats has been observed. Not only did smaller molecules pass from the luminal to the serosal side, but so also did larger proteins with the dimensions of luminal antigens and toxins. The increased permeability for macromolecules is primarily due to a decrease of the tightness of the zonula occludens, but an increased endocytotic uptake indicates that transcytosis is increased also. From studies of model systems it can be concluded that activation of the intracellular protein kinase C route by muscarinic receptor activation or histamine receptor activation can be one of the underlying cellular pathways. The physical pathway relaying the stress from the brain to the intestinal tract appears to be the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system. The difference in reaction of different strains suggests that coping style is an important determinant of the response of the intestinal barrier to stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05247.x

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stressful stimuli can enhance the permeability of the intestinal epithelium, which allows bacterial antigens to penetrate the gut epithelium and triggers an immune response in the intestinal mucosa.

    “For example, several studies have demonstrated that stressful stimuli can enhance the permeability of the intestinal epithelium, which allows bacterial antigens to penetrate the gut epithelium and triggers an immune response in the intestinal mucosa.23-27”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GROOT, J., BIJLSMA, P., KALKEREN, A. V., KILIAAN, A., SAUNDERS, P., & PERDUE, M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
GROOT, JACK
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
915
Issue
1
Pages
237-246
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2095668015
Cited by
44
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
intestinal barrier function, stress, muscarinic receptors, tight junctions, zonula occludens, intestinal permeability, transcytosis, protein kinase C, histamine receptors, parasympathetic nervous system, coping styles, strain differences, psychological stress, physical stress
MeSH terms
Animals, Intestinal Absorption, Intestinal Mucosa, Receptors, Muscarinic, Stress, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review