Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Programmed Cell Death (PCD): Apoptosis, Autophagic PCD, or Others?

BURSCH, W., ELLINGER, A., GERNER, CH., FRÖHWEIN, U., SCHULTE‐HERMANN, R.·2000·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A bstract: The occurrence of cell death as a physiological event in multicellular organisms has been known for more than 150 years; in 1972 the term apoptosis was introduced on morphological grounds. However, accumulating evidence suggests that programmed cell death (PCD) is not confined to apoptosis, but that cells use different pathways for active self‐destruction as reflected by different morphology: condensation prominent, type I or apoptosis; autophagy prominent, type II; etc. Autophagic PCD appears to be a phylogenetically old phenomenon; it may occur in physiological and disease states. We have studied the relation between morphological and biochemical events during autophagic and apoptotic PCD in human mammary, lymphoblast, and colon cancer cells using electron microscopy and proteom analysis. We find that autophagic cell death (type II) PCD includes degradation of Golgi apparatus, polyribosomes, and endoplasmic reticulum, which precedes nuclear destruction. Intermediate and microfilaments are largely preserved; presumably the cytoskeleton is required for autophagocytosis. Apoptosis (type I) PCD is characterized by condensation of cytoplasm and preservation of organelles; cytoskeletal elements disintegrate in early stages. Either type of PCD involves synthesis of distinct proteins. Finally, both types of PCD share features some of a cell's stress response (e.g., translocation of hsp90). In conclusion our findings support the concept that autophagic cell death is a separate pathway of PCD distinctly different from “classical” apoptosis. However, autophagic and apoptotic PCD should not be considered as mutually exclusive phenomena. Rather, they appear to reflect a high degree of flexibility in a cell's response to changes of environmental conditions, both physiological or pathological.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05594.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
BURSCH, W., ELLINGER, A., GERNER, C., FRÖHWEIN, U., & SCHULTE‐HERMANN, R.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12
Volume
926
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2003852184
Cited by
309
References
1
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Programmed Cell Death (PCD): Apoptosis, Autophagic PCD, or Others? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05594.x
The paper
BURSCH, W., ELLINGER, A., GERNER, C., FRÖHWEIN, U., & SCHULTE‐HERMANN, R. (2000). Programmed Cell Death (PCD): Apoptosis, Autophagic PCD, or Others? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05594.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.