Cited by 750Liver physiology and pathologyDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionWound Healing and Treatments

Hepatocyte growth factor/ c-met signaling pathway is required for efficient liver regeneration and repair

Open access
Huh, Chang-Goo, Factor, Valentina M., Sánchez, Aránzazu, Uchida, Koichi, Conner, Elizabeth A., Thorgeirsson, Snorri S.·2004·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor c-met signaling pathway is of central importance during development as well as in tumorigenesis. Because homozygous null mice for either hgf/sf or c-met die in utero, we used Cre/loxP-mediated gene targeting to investigate the function of c-met specifically in the adult liver. Loss of c-met appeared not to be detrimental to hepatocyte function under physiological conditions. Nonetheless, the adaptive responses of the liver to injury were dramatically affected. Mice lacking c-met gene in hepatocytes were hypersensitive to Fas-induced apoptosis. When injected with a low dose of anti-Fas antibody, the majority of these mice died from massive apoptosis and hemorrhagic necrosis, whereas all wild-type mice survived with signs of minor injury. After a challenge with a single necrogenic dose of CCl4, c-met conditional knockout mice exhibited impaired recovery from centrolobular lesions rather than a deficit in hepatocyte proliferation. The delayed healing was associated with a persistent inflammatory reaction, over-production of osteopontin, early and prominent dystrophic calcification, and impaired hepatocyte scattering/migration into diseased areas. These studies provide direct genetic evidence in support of the critical role of c-met in efficient liver regeneration and suggest that disruption of c-met affects primarily hepatocyte survival and tissue remodeling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0306068101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies in transgenic mice have suggested that hepatocyte proliferation is not a key mechanism regulating wound closure following necro-inflammatory liver injury.

    “Furthermore, previous studies in transgenic mice have suggested that hepatocyte proliferation is not a key mechanism regulating wound closure following necro-inflammatory liver injury”

    From Multimodal decoding of human liver regeneration (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Conditional knockout of the HGF receptor (Met) in mouse hepatocytes followed by CCl4-induced acute liver injury impaired centrilobular wound closure and restitution of normal tissue architecture, despite similar levels of hepatocyte proliferation compared with controls.

    “Conditional knockout of the HGF receptor (Met) in mouse hepatocytes followed by CCl4-induced acute liver injury impaired centrilobular wound closure and restitution of normal tissue architecture, despite similar levels of hepatocyte proliferation compared with controls27”

    From Multimodal decoding of human liver regeneration (2024) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Mice with hepatocellular-targeted deletion of MET have a high death rate at 48 h following PHx, whereas mice with whole body deletion of MET survive.

    “Mice with hepatocellular-targeted deletion of MET are reported to have a high death rate at 48 h following PHx whereas surprisingly, mice with a whole body deletion of the receptor have been reported to survive [21], [22].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huh, C.-G., Factor, V. M., Sánchez, A., Uchida, K., Conner, E. A., & Thorgeirsson, S. S.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Laboratory of Experimental Carcinogenesis, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 37 Convent Drive MSC 4262, Building 37, Room 4146A, Bethesda, MD 20892-4262
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2004-03-30
Volume
101
Issue
13
Pages
4477-4482
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1978514461
Cited by
750
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 50
FWCI
23.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
hepatocyte growth factor, c-Met, liver regeneration, liver injury repair, hepatocyte apoptosis, Fas-mediated apoptosis, carbon tetrachloride hepatotoxicity, osteopontin, dystrophic calcification, hepatocyte migration, hepatocyte proliferation, conditional knockout mice, tissue remodeling
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Tetrachloride Poisoning, Cell Division, Exons, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, Hepatocyte Growth Factor, Mice, Knockout, fas Receptor, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met, Hepatocytes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review