Cited by 27Vestibular and auditory disordersMotor Control and AdaptationMultisensory perception and integration

How Actions Alter Sensory Processing: Reafference in the Vestibular System

Open access
Cullen, Kathleen E., Brooks, Jessica X., Sadeghi, Soroush G.·2009·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Our vestibular organs are simultaneously activated by our own actions as well as by stimulation from the external world. The ability to distinguish sensory inputs that are a consequence of our own actions (vestibular reafference) from those that result from changes in the external world (vestibular exafference) is essential for perceptual stability and accurate motor control. Recent work in our laboratory has focused on understanding how the brain distinguishes between vestibular reafference and exafference. Single‐unit recordings were made in alert rhesus monkeys during passive and voluntary (i.e., active) head movements. We found that neurons in the first central stage of vestibular processing (vestibular nuclei), but not the primary vestibular afferents, can distinguish between active and passive movements. In order to better understand how neurons differentiate active from passive head motion, we systematically tested neuronal responses to different combinations of passive and active motion resulting from rotation of the head‐on‐body and/or head‐and‐body in space. We found that during active movements, a cancellation signal was generated when the activation of proprioceptors matched the motor‐generated expectation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03866.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]O'keefe J Nadel L The Hippocampus as a congnitive map 1978 Oxford, UK Clarendon Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cullen, K. E., Brooks, J. X., & Sadeghi, S. G.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cullen, Kathleen E.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05
Volume
1164
Issue
1
Pages
29-36
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2165281404
Cited by
27
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002390)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
vestibular nuclei, proprioception, vestibular processing, perceptual stability, rhesus monkeys
MeSH terms
Animals, Macaca mulatta, Models, Biological, Neck, Neurons, Afferent, Proprioception, Vestibule, Labyrinth, Head Movements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review