The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nutritional Enhancement of n‐3 and n‐6 Fatty Acids in Rotifers and Artemia Nauplii by Feeding Spray‐dried Schizochytrium sp.
Abstract
A docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), 22:6(n‐3), rich strain of Schizochytrium sp. was used in a spray‐dried form to evaluate the enhancement of highly unsaturated fatty acids (HUFAs) in Artemia franciscana nauplii (Utah biotype) and the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. This heterotrophic microalga was selected because of its high concentration of the longest chain HUFAs in the n‐3 and n‐6 series, DHA and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA), 22:5(n‐6), respectively. When 24‐h‐old Artemia nauplii were fed 400 mg/L of the algae for 24 h, the DHA content of the nauplii went from undetectable levels to 0.8% of dry weight and the omega‐3 HUFA eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), 20:5n‐3, content went from 0.1% to 0.5% of dry weight in the nauplii. Similarly, 22:5(n‐6) increased in the nauplii from undetectable levels to 0.4% of dry weight, with a concomitant increase in arachidonic acid, (20:4n‐6), from trace to 0.3% of dry weight even though there was no arachidonic acid in the algal biomass. Similar enrichment patterns were observed in rotifers. The results suggest that spray‐dried cells of Schizochytrium sp. are effective in enriching Artemia naupli and rotifers in both n‐3 and n‐6 HUFAs. The results also suggest that Artemia nauplii and rotifers are capable of readily retroconverting 22:6(n‐3) to 20:5(n‐3) and 22:5(n‐6) to 20:4(n‐6) through the process of β‐oxidation, a well‐known process in mammals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Volkman, J. (2003) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-002-1172-8 · Cited by 854
Suganya, T., Varman, M., Masjuki, H. H., & Renganathan, S. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.026 · Cited by 793
Microalgae in aquafeeds for a sustainable aquaculture industry
Shah, M. R., Lutzu, G. A., Alam, A., Sarker, P., Kabir Chowdhury, M. A., Parsaeimehr, A., Liang, Y., & Daroch, M. (2018) · Journal of Applied Phycology · doi:10.1007/s10811-017-1234-z · Cited by 463
Bergé, J.-P., & Barnathan, G. (2005) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/b135782 · Cited by 401
Potential of microalgae as a sustainable feed ingredient for aquaculture
Nagappan, S., Das, P., AbdulQuadir, M., Thaher, M., Khan, S., Mahata, C., Al-Jabri, H., Vatland, A. K., & Kumar, G. (2021) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.09.003 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Barclay, W., & Zeller, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 314-322
- ISSN
- 0893-8849 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-7345
- OpenAlex
- W2052402806
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutritional Enhancement of n‐3 and n‐6 Fatty Acids in Rotifers and Artemia Nauplii by Feeding Spray‐dried Schizochytrium sp. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1996.tb00614.x
- The paper
- Barclay, W., & Zeller, S. (1996). Nutritional Enhancement of n‐3 and n‐6 Fatty Acids in Rotifers and Artemia Nauplii by Feeding Spray‐dried Schizochytrium sp. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.1996.tb00614.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.