Cited by 116

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking Territory: Social Justice and Neoliberalism in Latin America’s Territorial Turn

Bryan, Joe·2012·Geography Compass

Abstract

The “territorial turn” in Latin America describes the trend towards state recognition of community property rights. This partial recognition of indigenous peoples’ and Afro‐descendants’ demands for territory has become a focal point for expanding neoliberal approaches to governance through the extension of new property rights regimes. This partial recognition of social movements’ demands has resulted in widespread efforts to rethink territory by social movements and scholars alike in order to better understand the conceptual work that the term does, its historical constitution, and its relevance to struggles for social justice. Those debates provide a grounded critique of territory, drawing attention to the calculative techniques used to bring it into being and their role in marginalizing other understandings of space and rights with far‐reaching implications for processes of subject formation. This review uses those debates to argue for a reconsideration of territory as process, highlighting the ways in which governing works through the term and how it constrains approaches to social justice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2012.00480.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x · DOI
  2. Agnew J, 2010, Territorialidades Superpuestas, Soberanía En Disputa: Lecciones Empíricas Desde América Latina, Tabula Rasa, 13, 191, 10.25058/20112742.409 · DOI
  3. Anaya S. J., 2004, Indigenous peoples in international law, 10.1093/oso/9780195173499.001.0001 · DOI
  4. Anaya S. J., 2001, The protection of indigenous peoples rights over lands and natural resources under the Inter‐American Human Rights System, Harvard Human Rights Journal, 14, 33
  5. Andersen M. E, 2010, Peoples of the earth: ethnonationalism, democracy and the indigenous challenge in ‘Latin’ America
  6. 10.1525/jlat.2007.12.2.384 · DOI
  7. Anderson M., 2009, Black and indigenous: garifuna activism and consumer culture in Honduras
  8. Arendt H, 1951, The origins of totalitarianism, (2004)
  9. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.09.014 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2005.tb01142.x · DOI
  11. Braun B., 2002, The Intemperate Rainforest
  12. 10.1002/9781444397499 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.09.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.0261-3050.2006.00162.x · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.09.016 · DOI
  16. Cusicanqui S. R, 2008, “Violencia e interculturalidad; paradojas de la etnicidad en la Bolivia de hoy, IX Jornadas Regionales de Investigación en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Diversidad Nacional de Jujuy, San Salvador de Jujuy
  17. Cusicanqui S. R., 2010, Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: Una reflexión sobre prácticas y discursos descolonizadores
  18. Deininger K., 2003, Land policies for growth and poverty reduction
  19. 10.1002/9780470773925 · DOI
  20. 10.4324/9780203849101 · DOI
  21. Delaney D., 2001, The legal geographies reader: law, power, and space, xiii
  22. Echeverri J. A, 2005, The land within: indigenous territory and the perception of the environment, 234
  23. 10.1068/d428t · DOI
  24. 10.1177/0309132510362603 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/S0962-6298(00)00064-0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/09502380903424208 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2009.01209.x · DOI
  28. 10.5149/9780807889886_french · DOI
  29. Gordon E. T., 1998, Disparate diasporas: identity and politics in an African Nicaraguan community
  30. 10.17730/humo.62.4.7ca3b00qhkv955t2 · DOI
  31. Gudynas E, 2009, The political ecology of the biocentric turn in Ecuador’s New Constitution, Revista de estudios sociales, 32, 34
  32. Gudynas E., 2010, Si eres tan progresista ¿por qué destruyes la naturaleza? Neoextractivismo, izquierda y alternativas, Ecuador Debate, 79, 61
  33. 10.1525/jlca.2006.11.2.351 · DOI
  34. 10.1525/pol.2005.28.1.10 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/03085147.2011.548947 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2008.tb00308.x · DOI
  37. 10.1215/9780822388302 · DOI
  38. Larson A., 2008, Tenure rights and beyond: community access to forest resources in Latin America
  39. Mamani Ramirez P, 2011, Remapping Bolivia: resources, territory and indigeneity in a Pluri‐National State, 30
  40. 10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x · DOI
  41. 10.1215/08992363-12-1-259 · DOI
  42. 10.1353/lar.2006.0012 · DOI
  43. 10.1177/1474474010384928 · DOI
  44. 10.1215/9780822387329 · DOI
  45. 10.11126/stanford/9780804755962.001.0001 · DOI
  46. 10.17730/humo.62.4.f9xgq4cu3ff88he0 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1111/j.0066-4812.2006.00569.x · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.004 · DOI
  49. Plant R., 2001, Land titling and indigenous peoples, 10.18235/0008860 · DOI
  50. Postero N. G., 2007, Now we are citizens: indigenous politics in postmulticultural Bolivia
  51. Quijano A., 2000, Nepantla, 533
  52. Radcliffe S. A, 2011, Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador, Geoforum
  53. Raffles H., 2002, In Amazonia: a natural history
  54. 10.1177/0308275X05053009 · DOI
  55. Rodríguez‐Piñero L., 2005, Indigenous peoples, postcolonialism, and international law: the ILO regime, 1919–1989, 10.1093/oso/9780199284641.001.0001 · DOI
  56. Roldán Ortega R., 2004, Models for recognizing indigenous land rights in Latin America, 10.1596/18392 · DOI
  57. 10.1017/CBO9780511488856 · DOI
  58. 10.1215/9780822385752 · DOI
  59. 10.1086/593704 · DOI
  60. 10.1080/14649360802441424 · DOI
  61. 10.7228/manchester/9780719037931.001.0001 · DOI
  62. Tuan Y. F., 1974, Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values
  63. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289172.003.0010 · DOI
  64. Wainwright J.(2008).Decolonizing development: colonial power and the Maya. Malden MA:Blackwell. · DOI
  65. 10.1068/d7707 · DOI
  66. 10.1177/1474474008101515 · DOI
  67. 10.1057/dev.2009.93 · DOI
  68. 10.1111/1467-9493.00140 · DOI
  69. 10.1215/9780822391074 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bryan, J.
Venue
Geography Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-16
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
215-226
ISSN
1749-8198
Cited by
116
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review