Cited by 284

Identification and Functional Characterization of microRNAs Involved in the Malignant Progression of Gliomas

Malzkorn, Bastian, Wolter, Marietta, Liesenberg, Franziska, Grzendowski, Michael, Stühler, Kai, Meyer, Helmut E., Reifenberger, Guido·2010·Brain Pathology

Abstract

Diffuse astrocytoma of World Health Organization (WHO) grade II has an inherent tendency to spontaneously progress to anaplastic astrocytoma WHO grade III or secondary glioblastoma WHO grade IV. We explored the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in glioma progression by investigating the expression profiles of 157 miRNAs in four patients with primary WHO grade II gliomas that spontaneously progressed to WHO grade IV secondary glioblastomas. Thereby, we identified 12 miRNAs (miR‐9, miR‐15a, miR‐16, miR‐17, miR‐19a, miR‐20a, miR‐21, miR‐25, miR‐28, miR‐130b, miR‐140 and miR‐210) showing increased expression, and two miRNAs (miR‐184 and miR‐328) showing reduced expression upon progression. Validation experiments on independent series of primary low‐grade and secondary high‐grade astrocytomas confirmed miR‐17 and miR‐184 as promising candidates, which were selected for functional analyses. These studies revealed miRNA‐specific influences on the viability, proliferation, apoptosis and invasive growth properties of A172 and T98G glioma cells in vitro. Using mRNA and protein expression profiling, we identified distinct sets of transcripts and proteins that were differentially expressed after inhibition of miR‐17 or overexpression of miR‐184 in glioma cells. Taken together, our results support an important role of altered miRNA expression in gliomas, and suggest miR‐17 and miR‐184 as interesting candidates contributing to glioma progression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2009.00328.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [23]23. Hindges R, Hübscher U (1997) DNA polymerase delta, an essential enzyme for DNA transactions. Biol Chem 378 :345-362.
  2. [24]24. Hossain A, Kuo MT, Saunders GF (2006) miR-17-5p Regulates breast cancer cell proliferation by inhibiting translation of AIB1 mRNA. Mol Cell Biol 26 :8191-8201.
  3. [35]35. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK (eds) (2007) WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System , 3rd edn. IARC Press: Lyon.
  4. [48]48. Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G (2009) Astrocytic tumors. In: Gliomas. Recent Results in Cancer Research , Vol. 171. A von Deimling (ed.), pp. 3-24. Springer: Berlin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malzkorn, B., Wolter, M., Liesenberg, F., Grzendowski, M., Stühler, K., Meyer, H. E., & Reifenberger, G.
Venue
Brain Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-12
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
539-550
ISSN
  • 1015-6305
  • 1750-3639
Cited by
284
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review