Cited by 706MicroRNA in disease regulationCancer-related molecular mechanisms researchCancer-related Molecular Pathways

MicroRNA-21 Targets a Network of Key Tumor-Suppressive Pathways in Glioblastoma Cells

Open access
Papagiannakopoulos, Thales, Shapiro, Alice, Kosik, Kenneth S.·2008·Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

MicroRNA dysregulation is observed in different types of cancer. MiR-21 up-regulation has been reported for the majority of cancers profiled to date; however, knowledge is limited on the mechanism of action of miR-21, including identification of functionally important targets that contribute to its proproliferative and antiapoptotic actions. In this study, we show for the first time that miR-21 targets multiple important components of the p53, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and mitochondrial apoptosis tumor-suppressive pathways. Down-regulation of miR-21 in glioblastoma cells leads to derepression of these pathways, causing repression of growth, increased apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest. These phenotypes are dependent on two of the miR-21 targets validated in this study, HNRPK and TAp63. These findings establish miR-21 as an important oncogene that targets a network of p53, TGF-β, and mitochondrial apoptosis tumor suppressor genes in glioblastoma cells. [Cancer Res 2008;68(19):8164–72]

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In glioblastoma cells, miR-21 directly targets and represses a network of p53, TGF-β, and mitochondrial apoptosis tumor-suppressive genes. Knockdown derepresses these pathways, increasing apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest and suppressing growth, with HNRPK and TAp63 required for key phenotypes.

Key findings

  • miR-21 knockdown in U251 cells caused 2- to 16-fold increases in mRNA levels of major p53/TGF-β/apoptotic pathway components; protein levels of examined targets increased 2- to 3-fold.
  • Luciferase assays validated direct targeting of JMY, TGFBR2, TGFBR3, HNRPK, TP73L (TAp63), APAF1, BMPR2, TOPORS, DAXX, TP53BP2, and PPIF; IGFBP3 did not change. The positive anti-miR-21 reporter showed a 70% decrease, and PDCD4 showed a ~30% decrease.
  • LNA-miR-21 increased Annexin V 1.5- to 2-fold at 24/48 h; siRNA against TAp63 or HNRPK reduced Annexin V induction by ~25%. miR-21 overexpression blocked doxorubicin-induced caspase-3/7 activation in U251 and U87 cells.
  • Knockdown suppressed growth over 4 days (most significant on day 3) and increased G0-G1 arrest in U251 by 21% with nocodazole and 25% with doxorubicin; siRNA-HNRPK/TAp63 produced a 2-fold decrease in G0-G1 arrest.

Methods

  • U251, U87, and HeLa cells were used; miR-21 was down-regulated with LNA-miR-21 or 2′-O-me-miR-21, and overexpressed in HeLa cells via lentivirus. Assays included real-time PCR, immunoblotting, dual luciferase reporters containing 60-bp 3′UTR sequences, CellTiter Glo growth assays, Annexin V and caspase-3/7 apoptosis assays, and PI cell-cycle analysis after nocodazole/doxorubicin synchronization.
  • Target prediction used TargetScan 3.1 (1,398 human miR-21 targets including duplicates), and network analysis used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis 3.0, yielding 765 network-eligible genes after filtering. Statistics used ANOVA or Student’s t test, with significance at P < 0.05 or P < 0.01; growth and apoptosis results represent means of three separate experiments.

Limitations

  • Stated: knockdown of HNRPK and TAp63 did not completely rescue the proapoptotic and cell-cycle arrest phenotypes, suggesting other critical miR-21 targets are involved.
  • Evident: all functional experiments were performed in cell lines (U251, U87, HeLa), with no in vivo tumor model or patient tumor samples in this paper.
  • Evident: luciferase validation used 60-bp 3′UTR fragments containing predicted sites rather than full 3′UTRs, and only selected predicted targets were validated.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-1305

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

5 of 26 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    In glioblastomas, significant effects of miRNAs occur indirectly rather than by direct targeting.

    “These data are also consistent with findings in glioblastomas that significant effects of miRNAs occur indirectly rather than by direct targeting (24,43).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [24] Li Q, Wang X, Wu X, et al. Daxx Cooperates with the Axin/HIPK2/p53 complex to induce cell death. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 66–74. source

      The Discussion passages describe Daxx, Axin, p53 and apoptosis, including experiments using siRNA against Axin. Searches for glioblastoma, miRNAs and indirect versus direct targeting found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed finding. The paper’s use of siRNA does not establish a claim about miRNA effects in glioblastomas. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [43] Johnson CD, Esquela-Kerscher A, Stefani G, et al. The let-7 MicroRNA represses cell proliferation pathways in human cells. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 7713–22. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says that only 25 of 176 early repressed genes were likely direct let-7 targets, and the cell-cycle section describes indirect changes downstream of direct targets. But the experiments used liver and lung cancer cell lines, not glioblastomas, so the glioblastoma-specific claim is not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    SERPINB5 is a transcriptional target of the functional convergence of p53 and TGF-h pathways.

    “Interestingly, a transcriptional target of the functional convergence of these pathways is SERPINB5, the transcript most highly up-regulated in response to miR-21 knockdown (Fig. 2A; ref. 42).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Wang SE, Narasanna A, Whitell CW, Wu FY, Friedman DB, Arteaga CL. Convergence of p53 and transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling on activating expression of the tumor suppressor gene maspin in mammary epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 5661–9. source
  • Findingreasoning

    Down-regulation of miR-21 in glioblastoma cells causes repression of growth.

    “Down-regulation of miR-21 in glioblastoma cells leads to derepression of these pathways, causing repression of growth, increased apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Upon down-regulation of miR-21 with LNA in U251 cells, mRNA levels of major components of the p53/TGF-B/apoptotic pathways increase significantly, ranging from 2-fold to 16-fold.

    “Upon down-regulation of miR-21 with LNA, we observed significant increases ranging from 2-fold to 16-fold in the levels of major components of the p53/TGF-h/apoptotic pathways, including many of the predicted targets (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    p53 pathway predicted targets of miR-21 include TP73L (TAp63) and activating cofactors JMY, TOPORS, HNRPK, and TP53BP2.

    “p53 pathway predicted targets included the tumor-suppressive homologue of p53, TP73L (TAp63), and activating cofactors of p53, such as JMY, TOPORS, HNRPK, and TP53BP2 (19, 21-26).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Three miR-21 targets have been described: PTEN, PDCD4, and TPM1.

    “Three miR-21 targets have, thus far, been described: phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN), programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) and Tropomyosin 1 (TPM1; refs.10,[14][15][16].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [10] Meng F, Henson R, Lang M, et al. Involvement of human micro-RNA in growth and response to chemotherapy in human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 2113–29. source

      The section “miR-21 Directly Alters PTEN Expression” (page unavailable) reports that miR-21 directly modulates expression through PTEN’s 3′-UTR, supporting PTEN as a target. Searches for PDCD4 and TPM1 found no passages in our copy describing either as a miR-21 target, so this source does not support those two parts of the list. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [14] Asangani IA, Rasheed SAK, Nikolova DA, et al. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally down-regulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncogene 2007; 27: 2128–36. source
    • cites [15] Frankel LB, Christoffersen NR, Jacobsen A, Lindow M, Krogh A, Lund AH. Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) is an important functional target of the microRNA miR-21 in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 1026–33. source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    TAp63 is a homologue of p53 and mediates both cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.

    “TAp63 is a homologue of p53 and is known to mediate both cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (19,38).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [19] Stiewe T. The p53 family in differentiation and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2007; 7: 165–7. source
    • cites [38] Gressner O, Schilling T, Lorenz K, et al. TAp63α induces apoptosis by activating signaling via death receptors and mitochondria. EMBO J 2005; 24: 2458–71. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    APAF1 and PPIF are predicted targets of miR-21.

    “APAF1 and PPIF are both predicted targets of miR-21 (Fig. 2C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    p53, DNA damage-activated p53 (Ser15), and p21 proteins increase upon miR-21 down-regulation, although they are not direct targets.

    “We also observed increases in proteins, such as p53, DNA damage-activated p53 (Ser 15 ), and p21, which are not targets but are indirectly negatively regulated by miR-21 (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In U251 and U87 cells, miR-21 overexpression abolished the dose-dependent increase in caspase-3/7 activity in response to doxorubicin, whereas scrambled controls showed a dose-dependent increase.

    “For both U251 and U87 cell lines, cells expressing the scrambled control showed a predicted dose-dependent increase in caspase-3/ caspase-7 activity, whereas the cells expressing miR-21 did not respond to the drug treatment even at higher doses (Fig. 5C).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The p53 pathway is functional and can mediate apoptosis in the U251 and U87 cell lines used.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    miR-21 regulates sets of genes, directly through targeting certain transcripts and indirectly in other cases.

    “We have shown that miR-21 regulates sets of genes, and the regulation is direct through targeting of certain transcripts, and in other cases, the effects are indirect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    miR-21 down-regulation significantly represses growth and leads to cell cycle arrest at G0-G1.

    “In addition, miR-21 down-regulation significantly represses growth and leads to cell cycle arrest at G 0 -G 1 , which can be explained by the up-regulation of p21 (Figs.2A and 4A), a protein that is known to regulate cell cycle checkpoints in response to its transactivation by p53.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The growth suppression continued throughout the 4 days, with the most significant difference observed on day 3.

    “This retarded growth continued throughout the 4 days with the most significant difference observed on day 3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    High levels of miR-21 were first reported in glioblastoma tumors and cell lines.

    “High levels of miR-21 were first reported in glioblastoma tumors and cell lines (6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-21 Is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 6029–33. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Inhibition of miR-21 by LNA or 2'-O-Me-miR-21 led to increased caspase-dependent apoptosis in glioblastoma cells, suggesting miR-21 acts as an oncogene to inhibit apoptosis.

    “In the same study, inhibition of miR-21 by LNA or 2 ¶O-Me-miR-21 led to increased caspase-dependent apoptosis, suggesting that miR-21 could be acting as an oncogene to inhibit apoptosis in glioblastoma cells (6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-21 Is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 6029–33. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    APAF1, BMPR2, PDCD4, and p21 are up-regulated in MCF-7 breast cancer cells with LNA-miR-21 treatment.

    “A subset of the derepressed transcripts, APAF1, BMPR2, PDCD4, and p21 were reported to be up-regulated in MCF-7 breast cancer cells with LNA-miR-21 treatment (15).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Frankel LB, Christoffersen NR, Jacobsen A, Lindow M, Krogh A, Lund AH. Programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) is an important functional target of the microRNA miR-21 in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 1026–33. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    miR-21 is up-regulated in the majority of human cancers profiled to date.

    “The majority of these profiling studies have reported increased levels of miR-21 in most human cancers (6,(8)(9)(10).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS. MicroRNA-21 Is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 6029–33. source
    • cites [8] Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu C-G, et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 2257–61. source
    • cites [9] Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Liu C-G, et al. MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 7065–70. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    DAXX plays a role in both p53 and TGF-h pathways and may be a key target in disrupting crosstalk between the two pathways.

    “DAXX, which can stabilize p53 in addition to mediating TGF-h apoptosis, plays a role in both pathways and, therefore, may be a key target in disrupting crosstalk between the two pathways (Supplementary Fig. S3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    miR-21 repressed p53-mediated apoptosis in response to doxorubicin-induced DNA damage, thereby contributing to drug resistance in glioblastoma cells.

    “MiR-21 repressed p53-mediated apoptosis in response to chemotherapeutic (doxorubicin)-induced DNA damage, therefore contributing to drug resistance in glioblastoma cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The p53 pathway is functional and can mediate apoptosis in the U251 and U87 cell lines used.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    miR-21 up-regulation in cancer cells is sufficient to inhibit p53-mediated apoptosis and protect cells from p53-mediated apoptosis in response to DNA damage induced by a chemotherapeutic agent.

    “This result indicates that miR-21 up-regulation in cancer cells is sufficient to inhibit p53-mediated apoptosis, thus protecting the cells from p53-mediated apoptosis in response to DNA damage induced by a chemotherapeutic agent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The p53 pathway is functional and can mediate apoptosis in the U251 and U87 cell lines used.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    p53 phosphorylated at Ser15 occurs in response to DNA damage and can mediate cell cycle arrest at G0-G1 by transactivation of p21.

    “In accordance, we observe a significant increase in the protein levels of p53 (Ser 15 ; Fig. 4A), which occurs in response to DNA damage and can mediate cell cycle arrest at G 0 -G 1 by transactivation of p21 (19).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Stiewe T. The p53 family in differentiation and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 2007; 7: 165–7. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Many miRNAs have evolved to regulate multiple components of certain pathways, thereby mediating more effective negative regulation on those pathways.

    “This finding is in agreement with limited data from other laboratories that suggests that many miRNAs have evolved to regulate multiple components of certain pathways, thus mediating a more effective negative regulation on those pathways (33).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Esau C, Davis S, Murray SF, et al. miR-122 regulation of lipid metabolism revealed by in vivo antisense targeting. Cell Metabol 2006; 3: 87–98. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    p53 activators JMY, TOPORS, TP53BP2, DAXX, and HNRPK can stabilize p53 protein levels by interfering with MDM2 and/or act as p53 transcriptional cofactors, assisting p53 in transactivating genes that induce apoptosis and growth arrest.

    “The miR-21 targets we identified included p53 homologue, p63, p53 activators JMY, TOPORS, TP53BP2, DAXX, and HNRPK, which can stabilize p53 protein levels by interfering with MDM2 and/or act as p53 transcriptional cofactors, assisting p53 in transactivating genes that can induce apoptosis and growth arrest (21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [21] Coutts AS, La Thangue NB. The p53 response: emerging levels of co-factor complexity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 331: 778–85. source
    • cites [22] Moumen A, Masterson P, O'Connor MJ, Jackson SP. hnRNP K: an HDM2 target and transcriptional coactivator of p53 in response to DNA damage. Cell 2005; 123: 1065–78. source
    • cites [23] Samuels-Lev Y, O'Connor DJ, Bergamaschi D, et al. ASPP proteins specifically stimulate the apoptotic function of p53. Mol Cell 2001; 8: 781–94. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The approach links putative targets around a function and identifies multiple targets and an entire network under miRNA control.

    “Our approach links putative targets around a function and succeeds in identifying not only multiple targets but uncover an entire network under miRNA control.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    miR-21 suppression of the p53 response may occur in most cancers where miR-21 is up-regulated, and this oncogenic mechanism may be a more significant contributor to malignancy in tumors with wild-type p53.

    “MiR-21 suppression of the p53 response may take place in most cancers where miR-21 is up-regulated, and this oncogenic mechanism may be even more significant contributor to malignancy in tumors with wild-type p53.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Resistance of gliomas to TGF-h may be partly due to miR-21 negative regulation of multiple TGF-h pathway components, including indirect regulation of TGFB1/2 and direct targeting of TGFBR2/3 and DAXX.

    “This resistance may be partly due to the negative regulation of multiple components of the pathway of miR-21, including the indirect regulation of TGFB1/2 and the direct targeting of the receptors TGFBR2/3 and the apoptotic mediator DAXX.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    miR-21 acts as a key oncogene modulating cell growth, desensitizing cells to apoptosis and cell cycle arrest.

    “These broad effects enable miR-21 to act as a key oncogene modulating cell growth, desensitizing cells to apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (Supplementary Fig. S3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Changes in the level of miR-21 are likely to dampen the robustness of a highly interconnected tumor-suppressive network and result in global regulation or dysregulation of network functions.

    “Due to the functional relationship among miR-21 targets, changes in the level of miR-21 is likely to dampen the robustness of a highly interconnected tumor-suppressive network and result in global regulation or dysregulation of the network functions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    miR-21 is embedded in a nexus of tumor suppression genes and has multiple specific targets in the network that lead to the observed phenotypes.

    “The effects we describe when we knockdown miR-21 suggest that miR-21 lies embedded in a nexus of tumor suppression genes and has multiple specific targets in the network that lead to the observed phenotypes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Cancer cells survive only if the apoptotic response is dampened or disrupted, cell cycle checkpoints are evaded, and unrestricted cell proliferation occurs.

    “Cancer cells therefore only survive if the apoptotic response is dampened or disrupted, cell cycle checkpoints are evaded, and unrestricted cell proliferation occurs (44).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000; 100: 57–70. source
25 of 25
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanism of action of miR-21, including its functionally important targets, is largely unknown.

    “Although miR-21 is emerging as a novel oncogene, its mechanism of action is largely unknown.”
    “knowledge is limited on the mechanism of action of miR-21, including identification of functionally important targets that contribute to its proproliferative and antiapoptotic actions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The known miR-21 targets PTEN, PDCD4, and TPM1 do not fully explain the antiapoptotic function of miR-21 in glioblastomas and other cancers.

    “However, these targets do not fully elucidate the antiapoptotic function of miR-21 in glioblastomas and other types of cancer.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Knowledge on the contribution of PDCD4 and TPM1 to the malignant phenotype of glioblastomas is limited.

    “On the other hand, knowledge is limited on the contribution of PDCD4 and TPM1 to the malignant phenotype of glioblastomas.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    U251 and U87 cell lines are representative models of glioblastoma for generalizing miR-21 function to glioblastoma.

    “We were able to show these effects in two established glioblastoma cells lines, U251 and U87.”
    “These results suggest that miR-21 plays an essential role in the proliferative capacity of glioblastoma cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The siRNA-mediated knockdown of HNRPK and TAp63 is specific and does not produce off-target effects that confound the cell cycle and apoptosis results.

    “In the presence of siRNA-HNRPK and siRNA-TAp63, we observed a 2-fold decrease in the proportion of cells arrested in G 0 -G 1 in response to miR-21 down-regulation.”
    “we used the same siRNAs previously tested in the Annexin V assays.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The p53 pathway is functional and can mediate apoptosis in the U251 and U87 cell lines used.

    “For both U251 and U87 cell lines, cells expressing the scrambled control showed a predicted dose-dependent increase in caspase-3/ caspase-7 activity, whereas the cells expressing miR-21 did not respond to the drug treatment even at higher doses (Fig. 5C).”
    “This result indicates that miR-21 up-regulation in cancer cells is sufficient to inhibit p53-mediated apoptosis, thus protecting the cells from p53-mediated apoptosis in response to DNA damage induced by a chemotherapeutic agent.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • miR-21 targets several genes such as PDCD4, TIMP3, and RECK, which are key regulators of apoptotic and metastatic pathways.

    “miR-21 targets several genes such as PDCD4, TIMP3, and RECK, which are key regulators of apoptotic and metastatic pathways (17–23).”

    From Potential Therapeutic Effects of Exosomes Packed With a miR-21-Sponge Construct in a Rat Model of Glioblastoma (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction identifies PDCD4 as a miR-21 target, and the target-validation section calls it a known target; the results also link PDCD4 to TGF-β-induced apoptosis. Our copy does not identify TIMP3 or RECK as miR-21 targets or establish their roles in metastatic pathways. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • miR-21 is overexpressed in almost all cancer types, and its upregulation promotes cell proliferation, invasion, and metastatic behavior.

    “miR-21 is a well-known miRNA, found to be overexpressed in almost all cancer types, where its upregulation promotes cell proliferation, invasion, and metastatic behavior.”

    From Potential Therapeutic Effects of Exosomes Packed With a miR-21-Sponge Construct in a Rat Model of Glioblastoma (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports increased miR-21 in most human cancers, while the Abstract and miR-21 target validation section (pages unavailable) support a role in glioblastoma cell growth. The claim's stronger “almost all cancer types” wording is not established, and this paper does not report that miR-21 promotes invasion or metastatic behavior. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Overexpressed miR-21 in cell lines can increase the proliferation rate and malignant behavior of the cells.

    “Our data on the effects of miR-21 enriched exosomes is in agreement with the previous reports demonstrating that overexpressed miR-21 in cell lines can increase the proliferation rate and malignant behavior of the cells (17–23).”

    From Potential Therapeutic Effects of Exosomes Packed With a miR-21-Sponge Construct in a Rat Model of Glioblastoma (2019) · cites this paper as [19]

    The MiR-21 target validation section reports that knocking down miR-21 suppressed growth in U251 and U87 glioblastoma cells, while overexpressing it protected those cells from drug-induced apoptosis. These findings support a role in proliferation and malignant behavior, but the paper does not show that overexpression itself increased the proliferation rate. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PDCD4, HNRNPK, and RECK are tumor suppressor genes and direct targets of miR-21-5p.

    “Previous studies have proven that PDCD4, HNRNPK and RECK are TSGs among the direct targets of miR-21-5p (13,(27)(28)(29).”

    From Functional interaction between miR-505-3p and miR-21 contributes to GBM suppression (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The MiR-21 target validation section reports direct-target evidence for HNRPK (the paper’s abbreviation for HNRNPK) and identifies PDCD4 as a known miR-21 target. The Discussion links HNRPK to tumor-suppressive activity, and the References identify PDCD4 as a tumor suppressor. Our copy does not establish RECK as a target or specifically identify the targets as miR-21-5p targets; no page numbers are available. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • miR-21 has been shown to be a strong antiapoptotic factor.

    “In particular, miRNA-21 (miR-21) has been shown to be a strong antiapoptotic factor [5, 9–11].”

    From MicroRNA‐21 protects neurons from ischemic death (2010) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Doxorubicin treatment starts at different times after transduction

    Minor

    The apoptosis assay methods say doxorubicin was added 24 hours after transduction, while the Figure 5 caption says it was added 48 hours after transduction.

  • Figure 6C cell-cycle assay timing conflicts with the methods

    Minor

    The results say nocodazole was added 24 hours after transfection and cells were harvested another 16 to 20 hours later. The Figure 6C caption instead says PI staining was performed 24 hours after transfection.

2 of 2

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

  • Cites a retracted work: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.032

    Info

    The cited work was retracted on 2024-10-31 (notice 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.008), not before this paper was published (2008-09-30).

    Cited work 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.032 · retracted 2024-10-31 · notice 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.008 · this paper published 2008-09-30

1 of 1

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papagiannakopoulos, T., Shapiro, A., & Kosik, K. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
  • 1Neuroscience Research Institute and
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2008-09-30
Volume
68
Issue
19
Pages
8164-8172
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2111990378
Cited by
705
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 79
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
W. M. Keck Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
miR-21, glioblastoma, miRNA target genes, p53 pathway, TGF-beta signaling, mitochondrial apoptosis, tumor suppressor pathways, TAp63, cell proliferation, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, oncogenes
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Glioblastoma, HeLa Cells, Humans, Models, Biological, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Signal Transduction, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Genes, p53, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Apoptosis, Gene Targeting, RNA, Small Interfering, MicroRNAs, Cell Proliferation, Genes, Mitochondrial, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-22.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-22.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review