Cited by 27Proteins in Food SystemsMeat and Animal Product QualityFood and Agricultural Sciences

Utilization of Soybeans and Their Components through the Development of Textured Soy Protein Foods

Katayama, M., Wilson, L.A.·2008·Journal of Food Science

Abstract

Textured soy protein (TSP), an extruded and fibrous-structured product, is mainly used as meat analog or extender. Meat alternatives are third in sales in the U.S. soy food marketplace. A primary problem that limits the incorporation of more TSP into products is the undesirable "beany" flavor. The objective of this study was to develop the best formulation of TSP and vegetable-based flavors to produce consumer acceptable "chicken" or "shrimp" flavored TSP using heat application processes. Four different types of commercial TSP (containing an average of 51% protein) strip-shaped extruded with a narrow die (STRIP-N) or with a wider die (STRIP-W), shred-shaped (SHRED) strips, and 1-cm crouton-shaped bits (BITs) were used. The TSPs were baked or deep-fat fried after soaking in 5 different commercial vegetable-based powered, liquid, or oil-based flavors ranged from 0% to 22.3% concentrations. Four descriptive analyses with a minimum of 14 trained panelists were utilized to evaluate the attributes of the finished TSP. Proximate, color, and texture analyses were performed on each TSP product. All treatments were statistically analyzed. Both instrumental and sensory tests demonstrated that BIT had a significantly higher crispness than other TSP. The powder type of chicken flavor used for a consumer panel had a more intense flavor than others with the optimum hydration time, 15 min. A consumer test with 125 people was performed with the highest chicken flavored (22.3%) fried and baked BIT. Overall, 66% of the total consumers preferred the fried BIT to the baked BIT, and 31% preferred the baked BIT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00663.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katayama, M., & Wilson, L. A.
Affiliations
Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Katayama, M.
  • Wilson, L.A.
Venue
Journal of Food Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-06
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
S158-64
ISSN
  • 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-3841
OpenAlex
W2123479598
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
textured soy protein, soybean utilization, meat substitutes, beany flavor, chicken flavor, extrusion, deep frying, sensory evaluation, consumer preferences, texture, color
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chemistry, Physical, Consumer Behavior, Dietary Proteins, Female, Food Handling, Food Technology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutritive Value, Glycine max, Taste, Soybean Proteins, Soy Foods, Chemical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review