The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection of Melamine in Gluten, Chicken Feed, and Processed Foods Using Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and HPLC
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Melamine, a nitrogen‐rich chemical, was implicated in pet and human food recalls in 2007, which caused enormous economic losses to the food industry. In this study, melamine concentration in wheat gluten, chicken feed, and processed foods (that is, cake and noodle) was measured by surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) in combination with SERS‐active substrates. SERS was able to rapidly detect 0.1% melamine in wheat gluten, 0.05% in chicken feed, 0.05% in cakes, and 0.07% in noodle, respectively. A partial least squares (PLS) model was established for the quantification of melamine in foods by SERS: R = 0.90, RMSEP = 0.33. In addition, SERS results were verified by HPLC analysis based on a simplified FDA method. Compared with HPLC, the SERS method is much faster and simpler, requires minimum sample preparation, but still yields satisfactory qualitative and quantitative results. These results demonstrate that it is an applicable approach to use SERS to screen foods, eliminate presumptive negative samples of melamine contamination from the sample population, and then verify presumptive positive samples using HPLC protocols. Combining these 2 methods could provide a more rapid and cost‐effective way for monitoring melamine contamination in increasingly large numbers of imported foods and feed products.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy
Haynes, C. L., McFarland, A. D., & Van Duyne, R. P. (2005) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac053456d · Cited by 1,144
Cited by
Evolving trends in SERS-based techniques for food quality and safety: A review
Jiang, L., Hassan, M. M., Ali, S., Li, H., Sheng, R., & Chen, Q. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.006 · Cited by 470
Self-citationCommon milk adulteration and their detection techniques
Azad, T., & Ahmed, S. (2016) · International Journal of Food Contamination · doi:10.1186/s40550-016-0045-3 · Cited by 339
Fan, Y., Lai, K., Rasco, B. A., & Huang, Y. (2015) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.011 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, M., He, L., Awika, J., Yang, L., Ledoux, D. R., Li, H., & Mustapha, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- T129-34
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W2052172233
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of Melamine in Gluten, Chicken Feed, and Processed Foods Using Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and HPLC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00901.x
- The paper
- Lin, M., He, L., Awika, J., Yang, L., Ledoux, D. R., Li, H., & Mustapha, A. (2008). Detection of Melamine in Gluten, Chicken Feed, and Processed Foods Using Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy and HPLC. Journal of Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00901.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.