The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common milk adulteration and their detection techniques
Open accessAbstract
Food adulteration is a global concern and developing countries are at higher risk associated with it due to lack of monitoring and policies. However, this is one of the most common phenomena that has been overlooked in many countries. Unfortunately, in contrast to common belief, milk adulterants can pose serious health hazards leading to fatal diseases. This paper presents a detailed review of common milk adulterants as well as different methods to detect the adulterants both qualitatively and quantitatively. This study is organized to be an 'adulterant based' study instead of 'techniques based' one, where qualitative detection for most of the common adulterants are enlisted and quantitative detection methods are limited to few major adulterants of milk. Apart from regular techniques, recent development in these detection techniques have also been reported. Nowadays milk is being adulterated in more sophisticated ways that demands for cutting edge research for the detection of the adulterants. This review intends to contribute towards the common knowledge base regarding possible milk adulterants and their detection techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moore, J. C., Spink, J., & Lipp, M. (2012) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02657.x · Cited by 805
Fingerprinting food: current technologies for the detection of food adulteration and contamination
Ellis, D. I., Brewster, V. L., Dunn, W. B., Allwood, J. W., Golovanov, A. P., & Goodacre, R. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35138b · Cited by 440
Melamine and the Global Implications of Food Contamination
Ingelfinger, J. R. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp0808410 · Cited by 334
Lin, M., He, L., Awika, J., Yang, L., Ledoux, D. R., Li, H., & Mustapha, A. (2008) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00901.x · Cited by 289
Melamine Sensing in Milk Products by Using Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering
Kim, A., Barcelo, S. J., Williams, R. S., & Li, Z. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac302025q · Cited by 196
Milk Preservatives and Adulterants: Processing, Regulatory and Safety Issues
Singh, P., & Gandhi, N. (2015) · Food Reviews International · doi:10.1080/87559129.2014.994818 · Cited by 173
Vicilin and convicilin are potential major allergens from pea
Sanchez‐Monge, R., Lopez‐Torrejón, G., Pascual, C. Y., Varela, J., Martin‐Esteban, M., & Salcedo, G. (2004) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02085.x · Cited by 172
Detection of melamine in liquid milk using surface‐enhanced Raman scattering spectroscopy
Zhang, X., Zou, M., Qi, X., Liu, F., Zhu, X., & Zhao, B. (2010) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.2629 · Cited by 156
Bakircioglu, D., Kurtulus, Y. B., & Uçar, G. (2010) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2010.10.017 · Cited by 142
Detection of Urea Adulteration in Milk Using Near-Infrared Raman Spectroscopy
Khan, K. M., Krishna, H., Majumder, S. K., & Gupta, P. K. (2014) · Food Analytical Methods · doi:10.1007/s12161-014-9873-z · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Azad, T., & Ahmed, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Food Contamination
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-2804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2559848180
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common milk adulteration and their detection techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40550-016-0045-3
- The paper
- Azad, T., & Ahmed, S. (2016). Common milk adulteration and their detection techniques. International Journal of Food Contamination. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40550-016-0045-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.