The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Quantum Dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Zinc oxide quantum dots (ZnO QDs) are nanoparticles of purified powdered ZnO. These were evaluated for antimicrobial activity against Listeria monocytogenes , Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. The ZnO QDs were utilized as a powder, bound in a polystyrene film (ZnO‐PS), or suspended in a polyvinylprolidone gel (ZnO‐PVP). Bacteria cultures were inoculated into culture media or liquid egg white (LEW) and incubated at 22 °C. The inhibitory efficacies of ZnO QDs against 3 pathogens were concentration dependent and also related to type of application. The ZnO‐PVP (3.2 mg ZnO/mL) treatment resulted in 5.3 log reduction of L. monocytogenes and 6.0 log reduction of E. coli O157:H7 in growth media after 48 h incubation, as compared to the controls. Listeria cells in the LEW control increased from 3.8 to 7.2 log CFU/mL during 8 d incubation, while the cells in the samples treated with 1.12 and 0.28 mg ZnO/mL were reduced to 1.4 and 3.0 log CFU/mL, respectively. After 8 d incubation, the cell populations of Salmonella in LEW in the presence of 1.12 and 0.28 mg ZnO/mL were reduced by 6.1 and 4.1 log CFU/mL over that of controls, respectively. ZnO powder and ZnO‐PVP showed significant antimicrobial activities against all 3 pathogens in growth media and LEW. ZnO‐PVP coating had less inhibitory effect than the direct addition of ZnO‐PVP. No antimicrobial activities of ZnO‐PS film were observed. This study suggested that the application of ZnO nanoparticles in food systems may be effective at inhibiting certain pathogens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alternative Antimicrobial Approach: Nano-Antimicrobial Materials
Beyth, N., Houri-Haddad, Y., Domb, A., Khan, W., & Hazan, R. (2015) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2015/246012 · Cited by 837
Antimicrobial Activity of Metal and Metal‐Oxide Based Nanoparticles
Gold, K., Slay, B., Knackstedt, M., & Gaharwar, A. K. (2018) · Advanced Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/adtp.201700033 · Cited by 758
Nanotechnology in food science: Functionality, applicability, and safety assessment
He, X., & Hwang, H.-M. (2016) · Journal of Food and Drug Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.001 · Cited by 474
Nanotechnology: History and future
Hulla, J., Sahu, S., & Hayes, A. (2015) · Human & Experimental Toxicology · doi:10.1177/0960327115603588 · Cited by 423
Khezerlou, A., Alizadeh-Sani, M., Azizi-Lalabadi, M., & Ehsani, A. (2018) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, T., Sun, D., Su, J. Y., Zhang, H., & Sue, H. ‐.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- M46-52
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W1975334138
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Quantum Dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.01013.x
- The paper
- Jin, T., Sun, D., Su, J. Y., Zhang, H., & Sue, H. ‐. (2009). Antimicrobial Efficacy of Zinc Oxide Quantum Dots against Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella Enteritidis, and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Journal of Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.01013.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.