The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and Application of a Database of Food Ingredient Fraud and Economically Motivated Adulteration from 1980 to 2010
Open accessAbstract
Food ingredient fraud and economically motivated adulteration are emerging risks, but a comprehensive compilation of information about known problematic ingredients and detection methods does not currently exist. The objectives of this research were to collect such information from publicly available articles in scholarly journals and general media, organize into a database, and review and analyze the data to identify trends. The results summarized are a database that will be published in the US Pharmacopeial Convention's Food Chemicals Codex , 8th edition, and includes 1305 records, including 1000 records with analytical methods collected from 677 references. Olive oil, milk, honey, and saffron were the most common targets for adulteration reported in scholarly journals, and potentially harmful issues identified include spices diluted with lead chromate and lead tetraoxide, substitution of Chinese star anise with toxic Japanese star anise, and melamine adulteration of high protein content foods. High‐performance liquid chromatography and infrared spectroscopy were the most common analytical detection procedures, and chemometrics data analysis was used in a large number of reports. Future expansion of this database will include additional publically available articles published before 1980 and in other languages, as well as data outside the public domain. The authors recommend in‐depth analyses of individual incidents. Practical Application: This report describes the development and application of a database of food ingredient fraud issues from publicly available references. The database provides baseline information and data useful to governments, agencies, and individual companies assessing the risks of specific products produced in specific regions as well as products distributed and sold in other regions. In addition, the report describes current analytical technologies for detecting food fraud and identifies trends and developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Common milk adulteration and their detection techniques
Azad, T., & Ahmed, S. (2016) · International Journal of Food Contamination · doi:10.1186/s40550-016-0045-3 · Cited by 339
Food safety in low and middle-income countries: The evidence through an economic lens
Hoffmann, V., Moser, C., & Saak, A. (2019) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104611 · Cited by 171
The Analytical Possibilities of FT-IR Spectroscopy Powered by Vibrating Molecules
Koczoń, P., Hołaj-Krzak, J. T., Palani, B. K., Bolewski, T., Dąbrowski, J., Bartyzel, B. J., & Gruczyńska-Sękowska, E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24021013 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, J. C., Spink, J., & Lipp, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- R118-26
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W1998083712
- Cited by
- 805
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Application of a Database of Food Ingredient Fraud and Economically Motivated Adulteration from 1980 to 2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02657.x
- The paper
- Moore, J. C., Spink, J., & Lipp, M. (2012). Development and Application of a Database of Food Ingredient Fraud and Economically Motivated Adulteration from 1980 to 2010. Journal of Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02657.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.