Cited by 58Fungal Infections and StudiesHelminth infection and controlParasitic infections in humans and animals

Pulmonary cryptococcosis and Capillaria aerophila infection in an FIV‐positive cat

BARRS, VR, MARTIN, P., NICOLL, RG, BEATTY, JA, MALIK, R.·2000·Australian Veterinary Journal

Abstract

A 12‐year‐old, FIV‐positive, domestic longhair cat was presented with a history of sneezing and coughing during the previous seven months. On thoracic radiographs, a prominent bronchial pattern and three focal, opacified nodules were seen. Cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid demonstrated spherical, capsulate, narrow‐necked, budding yeasts within macrophages. Culture of the fluid yielded a heavy growth of Cryptococcus neoformans var neoformans. The serum latex cryptococcal antigen agglutination test titre was 158. The cat was treated with itraconazole and the cough resolved over a 5‐month period but then recurred. Repeat thoracic radiographs showed resolution of the pulmonary nodules but a persistent bronchial pattern. Adult nematodes and ova with morphology characteristic of Capillaria aerophila were seen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and no yeasts were cultured from the fluid. The cryptococcal titre was zero. The lungworm infection was treated successfully with abamectin and the cough resolved. Immunosuppression related to FIV infection may have predisposed this cat to sequential respiratory tract infections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2000.tb10581.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BARRS, V., MARTIN, P., NICOLL, R., BEATTY, J., & MALIK, R.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Australian Veterinary Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
154-158
ISSN
  • 0005-0423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-0813
OpenAlex
W2055312331
Cited by
58
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian Veterinary Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
Keywords
pulmonary cryptococcosis, Capillaria aerophila, feline immunodeficiency virus, cats, Cryptococcus neoformans var. neoformans, lungworm infection, bronchoalveolar lavage cytology, itraconazole, abamectin, immunosuppression, opportunistic infections, respiratory infections
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthelmintics, Bronchopneumonia, Capillaria, Cat Diseases, Cats, Cryptococcosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Ivermectin, Male, Immunodeficiency Virus, Feline, Lentivirus Infections, Immunocompromised Host, Enoplida Infections, Bronchoalveolar Lavage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review