Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 613

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

UV‐B EFFECTS ON TERRESTRIAL PLANTS

Tevini, Manfred, Teramura, Alan H.·1989·Photochemistry and Photobiology

Abstract

The potential impacts of an increase in solar UV‐B radiation reaching the Earth's surface due to stratospheric ozone depletion have been investigated by several research groups during the last 15 years. Much of this research has centered on the effects of plant growth and physiology under artificial UV‐B irradiation supplied to plants in growth chambers or greenhouses. Since these artificial sources do not precisely match the solar spectrum and due to the wavelength dependency of photobiol‐ogical processes, weighting functions, based on action spectra for specific responses, have been developed to assess the biological effectiveness of the irradiation sources and of predicted ozone depletion. Recent experiments have also utilized artificially produced ozone cuvettes to filter natural solar radiation and simulate an environment of reduced UV‐B for comparative purposes. Overall, the effectiveness of UV‐B varies both among species and among cultivars of a given species. Sensitive plants often exhibit reduced growth (plant height, dry weight, leaf area, etc.), photosynthetic activity and flowering. Competitive interactions may also be altered indirectly by differential growth responses. Photosynthetic activity may be reduced by direct effects on photosynthetic enzymes, metabolic pathways or indirectly through effects on photosynthetic pigments or stomatal function. The fluence response of these changes has yet to be clearly demonstrated in most cases. Plants sensitive to UV‐B may also respond by accumulating UV‐absorbing compounds in their outer tissue layers, which presumably protect sensitive targets from UV damage. Several key enzymes in the biosynthetic pathways of these compounds have been shown to be specifically induced by UV‐B irradiation. Few studies have documented the effects of UV‐B on total plant yield under field conditions. One notable exception is a 6‐yr study with soybean demonstrating harvestable yield reductions under a simulated 25% ozone depletion. These effects are further modified by prevailing microclimatic conditions. Plants tend to be less sensitive to UV‐B radiation under drought or mineral deficiency, while sensitivity increases under low levels of visible light. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms of UV‐B effects and the interactions with present stresses and future projected changes in the environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb05552.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 613

Metadata

Authors
Tevini, M., & Teramura, A. H.
Venue
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-10
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
479-487
ISSN
  • 0031-8655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-1097
OpenAlex
W1996045108
Cited by
613
References
1
FWCI
19.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UV‐B EFFECTS ON TERRESTRIAL PLANTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb05552.x
The paper
Tevini, M., & Teramura, A. H. (1989). UV‐B EFFECTS ON TERRESTRIAL PLANTS. Photochemistry and Photobiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb05552.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.