The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Hot deck imputation is a method for handling missing data in which each missing value is replaced with an observed response from a “similar” unit. Despite being used extensively in practice, the theory is not as well developed as that of other imputation methods. We have found that no consensus exists as to the best way to apply the hot deck and obtain inferences from the completed data set. Here we review different forms of the hot deck and existing research on its statistical properties. We describe applications of the hot deck currently in use, including the U.S. Census Bureau's hot deck for the Current Population Survey (CPS). We also provide an extended example of variations of the hot deck applied to the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III). Some potential areas for future research are highlighted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,522
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 20,825
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,265
Self-citationClassification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
RUBIN, D. B. (1976) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/63.3.581 · Cited by 9,925
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
Self-citationMultiple imputation after 18+ years
Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · Cited by 4,072
An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data
Kass, G. V. (1980) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2986296 · Cited by 2,880
Cited by
A survey on missing data in machine learning
Emmanuel, T., Maupong, T., Mpoeleng, D., Semong, T., Mphago, B., & Tabona, O. (2021) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-021-00516-9 · Cited by 1,067
Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: multiple imputation is not always the answer
Hughes, R. A., Heron, J., Sterne, J. A. C., & Tilling, K. (2019) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyz032 · Cited by 802
Media’s role in broadcasting acute stress following the Boston Marathon bombings
Holman, E. A., Garfin, D. R., & Silver, R. C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1316265110 · Cited by 513
Madigan, S., Brumariu, L. E., Villani, V., Atkinson, L., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2016) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000029 · Cited by 397
Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004 · Cited by 297
Metadata
- Authors
- Andridge, R. R., & Little, R. J. A.
- Venue
- International Statistical Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-64
- ISSN
- 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-5823
- OpenAlex
- W2162313689
- Cited by
- 1,077
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 23.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x
- The paper
- Andridge, R. R., & Little, R. J. A. (2010). A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response. International Statistical Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
