Cited by 297Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Technology and AssessmentWriting and Handwriting Education

Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality

Wilson, Joshua, Czik, Amanda·2016·Computers & Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automated essay scoring tools like MI Write can help students improve their writing motivation, writing self-efficacy, and writing skills.

    “Several studies have demonstrated that automated essay scoring tools like MI Write can help students to improve their writing motivation (Wilson & Czik, 2016), writing self-efficacy (Wilson & Roscoe, 2020) and writing skills (Palermo & Thomson, 2018)”

    From Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as Wilson & Czik, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, J., & Czik, A.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Wilson, Joshua
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
100
Pages
94-109
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2511117069
Cited by
297
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
54.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-04-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Delaware
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
automated essay evaluation, writing instruction, teacher feedback, student motivation, writing quality, eighth grade students, English language arts, feedback timing, writing assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review