Cited by 29Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

US Trends in Glycemic Control, Treatment, and Comorbidity Burden in Patients With Diabetes

Open access
Shaya, Fadia T., Yan, Xia, Lin, Pei‐Jung, Simoni‐Wastila, Linda, Bron, Morgan, Baran, Robert, Donner, Thomas W.·2010·The Journal of Clinical Hypertension

Abstract

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:826‐832. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This study explored trends over time in diabetes prevalence, glycemic control, and antidiabetic therapy choices among adults (18–64 years) and older adults (≥65 years). Factors that predict diabetes outcomes were explored. The study was cross‐sectional, with data from the 1999 to 2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study group consisted of 1211 persons with self‐reported diabetes. Other information obtained from the study included self‐reported medication for diabetes, hypertension, stroke, heart failure, and health status. The survey also provided examination or laboratory tests of obesity, nephropathy, and glycosylated hemoglobin level. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were used in the study. The study showed that the proportion of diabetics with good glycemic control increased during the period from 1999 to 2004. However, nearly half of the adults and one third of older adults with diabetes did not reach glycemic control in 2003–2004. Overall, 59% of adults and 46% of older adults were obese. There was a high prevalence of hypertension, heart failure, stroke, and nephropathy among patients with diabetes, especially in older adults. The results indicate a high percentage of poor glycemic control among persons with diabetes. There were also a substantial number of comorbid conditions associated with diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00365.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shaya, F. T., Yan, X., Lin, P., Simoni‐Wastila, L., Bron, M., Baran, R., & Donner, T. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Shaya, Fadia T.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
826-832
ISSN
  • 1524-6175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-7176
OpenAlex
W1987005319
Cited by
29
References
28
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, antidiabetic therapy, comorbidities, diabetes prevalence, older adults, obesity, hypertension, heart failure, stroke, diabetic nephropathy, HbA1c, health status, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, United States, Comorbidity, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review