Cited by 149Education Discipline and InequalityCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlCriminal Justice and Penology

Beyond Fear: Sociological Perspectives on the Criminalization of School Discipline

Hirschfield, Paul J., Celinska, Katarzyna·2011·Sociology Compass

Abstract

Since the early 1990s American schools have adopted a number of practices – zero tolerance, school police, metal detectors, drug sweeps, and surveillance cameras – that signal a shift from a discretionary student disciplinary framework to a crime control paradigm. The sociological sub‐field that centers on the examination and interpretation of the criminalization of school discipline is still in its formative stages and, consequently, even basic conceptual issues remain unsettled. However, sustained by a growing body of ethnographic research, the field’s theoretical discussions and debates regarding the causes, consequences, and social distribution of school criminalization are complex, vibrant, and synergistic. In the broadest terms, this field explores how school criminalization expresses, accommodates, and reinforces broader fears and political‐economic changes. The field also includes a disappointingly but understandably small number of quantitative studies that bear directly on these theories. The field’s critical, sociological insights will find and resonate with a broader audience (including policy‐makers) only after an equally innovative and vigorous quantitative empirical tradition emerges to refine and validate its theoretical contributions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00342.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Schools have become 'prison-like' through investments in surveillance, the arrival of police officers on campus, and zero tolerance policies that mirror the punitive shift of the criminal legal system.

    “a large body of scholarship during the prison boom describes how schools have become “prison-like” through investments in surveillance, the arrival of police officers on campus, and zero tolerance policies that mirror the punitive shift of the criminal legal system (Hirschfield 2008;Rios 2017;Hirschfield and Celinska 2011;Wolf and Kupchik 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirschfield, P. J., & Celinska, K.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Sociology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1599803866
Cited by
149
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
24.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
student discipline, zero tolerance policy, school policing, school surveillance, fear, political economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review