Beyond Fear: Sociological Perspectives on the Criminalization of School Discipline
Abstract
Since the early 1990s American schools have adopted a number of practices – zero tolerance, school police, metal detectors, drug sweeps, and surveillance cameras – that signal a shift from a discretionary student disciplinary framework to a crime control paradigm. The sociological sub‐field that centers on the examination and interpretation of the criminalization of school discipline is still in its formative stages and, consequently, even basic conceptual issues remain unsettled. However, sustained by a growing body of ethnographic research, the field’s theoretical discussions and debates regarding the causes, consequences, and social distribution of school criminalization are complex, vibrant, and synergistic. In the broadest terms, this field explores how school criminalization expresses, accommodates, and reinforces broader fears and political‐economic changes. The field also includes a disappointingly but understandably small number of quantitative studies that bear directly on these theories. The field’s critical, sociological insights will find and resonate with a broader audience (including policy‐makers) only after an equally innovative and vigorous quantitative empirical tradition emerges to refine and validate its theoretical contributions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Schools have become 'prison-like' through investments in surveillance, the arrival of police officers on campus, and zero tolerance policies that mirror the punitive shift of the criminal legal system.
“a large body of scholarship during the prison boom describes how schools have become “prison-like” through investments in surveillance, the arrival of police officers on campus, and zero tolerance policies that mirror the punitive shift of the criminal legal system (Hirschfield 2008;Rios 2017;Hirschfield and Celinska 2011;Wolf and Kupchik 2017).”
From The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System (2025) · cites this paper as Hirschfield and Celinska 2011
Cites
Racial Threat and Punitive School Discipline
Welch, K., & Payne, A. A. (2010) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2010.57.1.25 · Cited by 445 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Likewise, Welch and Payne (2010) examined myriad possible sources of variation in schools’ use of ‘extreme disciplinary measures’ (e.g. notifying police and charging students with crimes).”
BackgroundThe New American School: preparation for post‐industrial discipline
Kupchik, A., & Monahan, T. (2006) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425690600958816 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pentek, C., & Eisenberg, M. E. (2018) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.008 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
School‐Based Interventions for Reducing Disciplinary School Exclusion. An Updated Systematic Review
Valdebenito, S., Gaffney, H., Arosemena‐Burbano, M. J., Hitchcock, S., Jolliffe, D., & Sutherland, A. (2025) · Campbell Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/cl2.70063 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Rise of the Carceral State: Foundations and Contours of a Rapidly Changing Criminal Legal System
Wakefield, S., & Turney, K. (2025) · RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences · doi:10.7758/rsf.2025.11.3.04 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…one possible response, as scholars have detailed how schools increasingly use surveillance, zero tolerance policies, and embedded police officers to create conditions that resemble the criminal legal system (Haskins and Jacobsen 2017; Hirschfield and Celinska 2011; Wolf and and Kupchik 2017).”
- Authors
- Hirschfield, P. J., & Celinska, K.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Venue
- Sociology Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1599803866
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 24.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- student discipline, zero tolerance policy, school policing, school surveillance, fear, political economy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review