CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 231Water Quality and Pollution AssessmentSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsWater Quality and Resources Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF LANDUSE ON WATER QUALITY IN A SOUTHERN APPALACHIAN WATERSHED1

Bolstad, Paul V, Swank, Wayne T·1997·JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03529.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Water quality variables were sampled over 109 weeks along Coweeta Creek, a fifth‐order stream located in the Appalachian mountains of western North Carolina. The purpose of this study was to observe any changes in water quality, over a range of flow conditions, with concomitant downstream changes in the mix of landuses. Variables sampled include pH, HCO 32−, conductivity, NO 3−−‐N, NH 4+‐N, PO 43−‐P, C1−‐, Na, K, Ca 2+, Mg 2+, SO 42−, 5iO 2, turbidity, temperature, dissolved oxygen, total and fecal coliform, and focal streptococcus. Landcover/landuse was interpreted from 1:20,000 aerial photographs and entered in a GIS, along with information on total and paved road length, building location and density, catchment boundaries, hydrography, and slope. Linear regressions were performed to relate basin and near‐stream landscape variables to water quality. Consistent, cumulative, downstream changes in water quality variables were observed along Coweeta Creek, concomitant with downstream, human‐caused changes in landuse. Furthermore, larger downstream changes in water quality variables were observed during stormflow when compared to baseflow, suggesting cumulative impacts due to landscape alteration under study conditions were much greater during storm events. Although most water quality regulations, legislation, and sampling are promulgated for baseflow conditions, this work indicates they should also consider the cumulative impacts of physical, chemical, and biological water quality during stormflow.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03529.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More forests mean more wildlife habitats, low-cost recreational lands, and cleaner water and air because trees deliver pollutant filtration.

    “In addition, more forests mean more wildlife habitats and low-cost recreational lands, as well as cleaner water and air because trees deliver powerful pollutant filtration ecosystems (48, 53, 54).”

    From A framework for localizing global climate solutions and their carbon reduction potential (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Deal J. M., 1996, Procedures for Chemical Analyses at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory
  2. Johnston C. A., 1988, Geographic Information Systems for Cumulative Impact Assessment, Photogramm. Engng. Remote Sensing, 54, 1609
  3. Johnston C. A., Geographic Information Systems for Cumulative Impact Assessment, Photogramm. Engng. Remote Sensing, 54, 1609
  4. Leibowitz N. C. T. R.Boumans andJ. G.Gosselink 1987.Hydrology as an Index for Cumulative Impact Studies. In:Proceedings of the National Wetland Symposium: Wetland Hydrology J. A.KuslerandG.Brooks(Editors). ASWM Tech. Report 4:83–90.
  5. McSwain M. R., 1977, Watershed Research in Eastern North America: A Workshop to Compare Results, 555
  6. Millipore Corporation, 1986, Water Microbiology Laboratory and Field Procedures, AB323
  7. Swank W. T.andP. V.Bolstad 1994.Cumulative Effects of Landose Practices on Water Quality. In: Hydrological Chemical and Biological Processes of Transformation and Transport of Contaminants in Aquatic Environments. Proceedings of the Rostov‐on‐Don Symposium IAHS Publ. No. 219.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bolstad, P. V., & Swank, W. T.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-06
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
519-533
ISSN
  • 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1688
DOI
10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03529.x
OpenAlex
W2120800347
Cited by
231
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 3659 d)
Locations
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Resources Studies
Keywords
land use, water quality, cumulative effects, watershed land cover, Southern Appalachians, stormflow, baseflow, nitrogen, phosphorus, fecal coliforms, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, road density, landscape change, water quality regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review