The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CONTINENTAL SCALE SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE1
Abstract
This paper describes the application of a continuous daily water balance model called SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) for the conterminous U.S. The local water balance is represented by four control volumes; (1) snow, (2) soil profile, (3) shallow aquifer, and (4) deep aquifer. The components of the water balance are simulated using “storage” models and readily available input parameters. All the required databases (soils, landuse, and topography) were assembled for the conterminous U.S. at 1:250,000 scale. A GIS interface was utilized to automate the assembly of the model input files from map layers and relational databases. The hydrologic balance for each soil association polygon (78,863 nationwide) was simulated without calibration for 20 years using dominant soil and land use properties. The model was validated by comparing simulated average annual runoff with long term average annual runoff from USGS stream gage records. Results indicate over 45 percent of the modeled U.S. are within 50 mm of measured, and 18 percent are within 10 mm without calibration. The model tended to under predict runoff in mountain areas due to lack of climate stations at high elevations. Given the limitations of the study, (i.e., spatial resolution of the data bases and model simplicity), the results show that the large scale hydrologic balance can be realistically simulated using a continuous water balance model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Williams, J. R. (1998) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x · Cited by 7,945
Self-citation
Cited by
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H., & Arnold, J. G. (2007) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/2013.23637 · Cited by 3,040
Self-citationAbbaspour, K. C., Rouholahnejad, E., Vaghefi, S., Srinivasan, R., Yang, H., & Kløve, B. (2015) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.027 · Cited by 1,833
Self-citationVALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES1
Santhi, C., Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Dugas, W. A., Srinivasan, R., & Hauck, L. M. (2001) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.x · Cited by 1,422
Self-citationMathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology
Singh, V. P., & Woolhiser, D. A. (2002) · Journal of Hydrologic Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2002)7:4(270 · Cited by 843
Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover
Nearing, M. A., Jetten, V., Baffaut, C., Cerdan, O., Couturier, A., Hernandez, M., Le Bissonnais, Y., Nichols, M. H., Nunes, J. P., Renschler, C. S., et al. (2005) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2005.03.007 · Cited by 799
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Allen, P. M.
- Venue
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1037-1051
- ISSN
- 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1688
- OpenAlex
- W2046598310
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONTINENTAL SCALE SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04192.x
- The paper
- Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., & Allen, P. M. (1999). CONTINENTAL SCALE SIMULATION OF THE HYDROLOGIC BALANCE1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04192.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.