Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61Transboundary Water Resource ManagementFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementCross-Border Cooperation and Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Transboundary River Floods and Institutional Capacity1

Bakker, Marloes H.N.·2009·JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
DOI 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00325.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract: While transboundary flood events have become more frequent on a global scale the past two decades, they appear to be overlooked in the international river basin (IRB) cooperation and management arena. The present study therefore combined geopolitical measures with biophysical and socioeconomic variables in an attempt to identify the IRBs with adequate institutional capacity for management of transboundary floods. It also classified basins that would possibly benefit from enlarging the institutional capacity related to transboundary floods. Of the 279 known IRBs, only 78 were represented by a transboundary rivers institution. A mere eight of the 153 identified institutions had transboundary flooding listed as an issue in their mandate. Overall, 43 basins, where transboundary floods were frequent during the period 1985‐2005, had no institutional capacity for IRBs. The average death and displacement tolls were found to be lower in the 37 basins with institutional capacity, even though these basins experienced twice as much transboundary floods with significant higher magnitudes than those in basins without institutional capacity. Overall, the results suggested that institutional capacity plays a role in the reduction of flood‐related casualties and affected individuals. River basins such as the Juba‐Shibeli, Han, Kura‐Araks, Ma, Maritsa, Po, Coco/Segovia, Grijalva, Artibonite, Changuinola, Coatan Achute, and Orinoco experienced more than one transboundary river flood, but have not yet set up any institutions for such events, or signed any appropriate treaties focused on floods. These basins were therefore recommended to consider focusing attention on this apparent lack of institutional capacity when it comes to managing transboundary flood events.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00325.x

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Enserink B., 2003, Public Participation in River Basin Management in the Netherlands: (not) Everybody’s Concern
  2. Maganga F.P., 2003, 4th WaterNet/Warfsa Symposium: Water, Science, Technology & Policy Convergence and Action
  3. Roll G., 2008, Analysis of European IWRM Research on Transboundary Regimes, 45
  4. Tóth S., 2004, Sustainable Flood Management Action Programme of the Danube River Basin With Regard to Flood Forecasting and Flood Prevention
  5. Turton A., 2002, Hydropolitics in the Developing World: Southern African Perspective
  6. UNDP, 2004, A Global Report: Reducing Disaster Risk, A Challenge for Development

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bakker, M. H. N.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bakker, Marloes H.N.
Venue
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-26
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
553-566
ISSN
  • 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1688
DOI
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00325.x
OpenAlex
W2156029898
Cited by
59
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Keywords
institutional capacity, transboundary water management, flood displacement, international treaties, geopolitical factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.