The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes
Abstract
COI DNA barcoding is increasingly recognized as a significant new tool for the recognition and identification of animal species. Here, publicly available barcode data are compiled and analysed for birds (657 species) and fishes (1088 species). The proportion of species that cannot be barcode‐distinguished by this marker is approximately 6.4% for birds and 2.1–2.5% for fishes. At all hierarchical taxonomic levels (species, genera, family, order, class), fish show greater mean COI divergence than birds. If two samples are barcode‐identical, then for both birds and fishes, the probability that they are from the same species is 98–99%. The probability of conspecificity rapidly drops as divergence increases. At 2% COI divergence, this probability approximates to 1% for birds and 3% for fishes. The apparent difference between birds and fishes might partially reflect currently unrecognized cryptic species complexes in the latter. These probability estimates derive from pooled samples of birds and pooled samples of fishes, and will not apply in all situations. Recently evolved species complexes will have higher proportions of species that are barcode‐identical. As barcode data accumulate, more refined statistical analyses will become possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kimura, M. (1980) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01731581 · Cited by 29,778
MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2007) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msm092 · Cited by 28,730
Biological identifications through DNA barcodes
Hebert, P. D. N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L., & deWaard, J. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 · Cited by 13,376
bold : The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org)
RATNASINGHAM, S., & HEBERT, P. D. N. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x · Cited by 6,376
DNA barcoding Australia's fish species
Ward, R. D., Zemlak, T. S., Innes, B. H., Last, P. R., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1716 · Cited by 4,332
Self-citationIdentification of Birds through DNA Barcodes
Hebert, P. D. N., Stoeckle, M. Y., Zemlak, T. S., & Francis, C. M. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312 · Cited by 2,653
DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling
Meyer, C. P., & Paulay, G. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422 · Cited by 1,957
Universal primer cocktails for fish DNA barcoding
IVANOVA, N. V., ZEMLAK, T. S., HANNER, R. H., & HEBERT, P. D. N. (2007) · Molecular Ecology Notes · doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01748.x · Cited by 1,488
DNA Barcoding: Promise and Pitfalls
Moritz, C., & Cicero, C. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020354 · Cited by 998
The phylogeography of Y chromosome binary haplotypes and the origins of modern human populations
UNDERHILL, P. A., PASSARINO, G., LIN, A. A., SHEN, P., MIRAZÓN LAHR, M., FOLEY, R. A., OEFNER, P. J., & CAVALLI‐SFORZA, L. L. (2001) · Annals of Human Genetics · doi:10.1046/j.1469-1809.2001.6510043.x · Cited by 791
Cited by
DNA Barcoding of Marine Metazoa
Bucklin, A., Steinke, D., & Blanco-Bercial, L. (2011) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-080950 · Cited by 559
Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna?
Pereira, L. H., Hanner, R., Foresti, F., & Oliveira, C. (2013) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-14-20 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- WARD, R. D.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-22
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1077-1085
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W2036977999
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02541.x
- The paper
- WARD, R. D. (2009). DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes. Molecular Ecology Resources. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02541.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.