The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data
Abstract
Pedigrees, depicting genealogical relationships between individuals, are important in several research areas. Molecular markers allow inference of pedigrees in wild species where relationship information is impossible to collect by observation. Marker data are analysed statistically using methods based on Mendelian inheritance rules. There are numerous computer programs available to conduct pedigree analysis, but most software is inflexible, both in terms of assumptions and data requirements. Most methods only accommodate monogamous diploid species using codominant markers without genotyping error. In addition, most commonly used methods use pairwise comparisons rather than a full‐pedigree likelihood approach, which considers the likelihood of the entire pedigree structure and allows the simultaneous inference of parentage and sibship. Here, we describe colony , a computer program implementing full‐pedigree likelihood methods to simultaneously infer sibship and parentage among individuals using multilocus genotype data. colony can be used for both diploid and haplodiploid species; it can use dominant and codominant markers, and can accommodate, and estimate, genotyping error at each locus. In addition, colony can carry out these inferences for both monoecious and dioecious species. The program is available as a Microsoft Windows version, which includes a graphical user interface, and a Macintosh version, which uses an R‐based interface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current trends in microsatellite genotyping
GUICHOUX, E., LAGACHE, L., WAGNER, S., CHAUMEIL, P., LÉGER, P., LEPAIS, O., LEPOITTEVIN, C., MALAUSA, T., REVARDEL, E., SALIN, F., et al. (2011) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03014.x · Cited by 937
Common garden experiments in the genomic era: new perspectives and opportunities
de Villemereuil, P., Gaggiotti, O. E., Mouterde, M., & Till-Bottraud, I. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.93 · Cited by 384
Goulson, D., Kaden, J. C., Lepais, O., Lye, G. C., & Darvill, B. (2011) · Conservation Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10592-011-0190-4 · Cited by 53
Patterns of Genetic Diversity and Mating Systems in a Mass-Reared Black Soldier Fly Colony
Hoffmann, L., Hull, K. L., Bierman, A., Badenhorst, R., Bester-van der Merwe, A. E., & Rhode, C. (2021) · Insects · doi:10.3390/insects12060480 · Cited by 45
Noninvasive Sampling Reveals Short-Term Genetic Rescue in an Insular Red Fox Population
Quinn, C. B., Alden, P. B., & Sacks, B. N. (2019) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esz024 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- JONES, O. R., & WANG, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-04-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 551-555
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W2055625638
- Cited by
- 1,831
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02787.x
- The paper
- JONES, O. R., & WANG, J. (2010). COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Molecular Ecology Resources. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02787.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.