The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AGE VARIATIONS IN NORMAL HUMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY
Abstract
The visual contrast sensitivity (the reciprocal of contrast threshold) was studied as a function of age. Psychophysical measurements of binocular and monocular contrast thresholds were made for 33 normal observers at spatial frequencies within the range 0.5 to 40 cycles/degree. The observers were divided into three different age groups: young, middle‐aged, and old subjects with the age ranges 6–10 years, 20–40 years, and 60–70 years, respectively. All observers had healthy eyes, normal vision, and Snellen visual acuity of 1.0 or better in both eyes. In all groups, contrast sensitivity for binocular and monocular viewing peaked at a spatial frequency around 3–5 cycles/degree and showed the typical attenuation at low and high spatial frequencies. The binocular contrast sensitivity was higher than the monocular. There was no significant difference between young and middle‐aged subjects with regard to contrast sensitivity. Subjects aged 60 years or more showed significantly lower contrast sensitivity than younger subjects for most spatial frequencies above 4 cycles/degree. We may thus conclude that both the binocular and monocular contrast sensitivity seemed independent of age within the range of 6 to 40 years. For higher ages studied (above 60 years), there was a loss of sensitivity in the middle and high frequency regions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blakemore, C., & Campbell, F. W. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862 · Cited by 2,030
Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution.
Campbell, F. W., & Green, D. G. (1965) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784 · Cited by 1,595
Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity
CAMPBELL, F. W., & GREEN, D. G. (1965) · Nature · doi:10.1038/208191a0 · Cited by 470
Hess, R. F., & Howell, E. R. (1977) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(77)90009-8 · Cited by 470
Mitchell, D. E., Freeman, R. D., Millodot, M., & Haegerstrom, G. (1973) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(73)90023-0 · Cited by 279
REGAN, D., SILVER, R., & MURRAY, T. J. (1977) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/100.3.563 · Cited by 254
Arden, G. B., & Jacobson, J. J. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 252
Hess, R. F., & Woo, G. C. (1978) · PubMed · Cited by 236
Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Cerebral Lesions
Bodis-Wollner, I. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4062.769 · Cited by 194
Bodis-Wollner, I. G., & DIAMOND, S. P. (1976) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/99.4.695 · Cited by 143
Cited by
Neural bases of visual deficits during aging
Spear, P. D. (1993) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90218-l · Cited by 406
Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test
Mäntyjärvi, M., & Laitinen, T. (2001) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00562-9 · Cited by 259
Neural contribution to spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity decline in healthy ageing eyes
Elliott, D., Whitaker, D., & MacVeigh, D. (1990) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/0042-6989(90)90066-t · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- DEREFELDT, G., LENNERSTRAND, G., & LUNDH, B.
- Venue
- Acta Ophthalmologica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-08
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 679-690
- ISSN
- 0001-639X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-375X
- 1755-3768
- OpenAlex
- W2007131749
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AGE VARIATIONS IN NORMAL HUMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1979.tb00517.x
- The paper
- DEREFELDT, G., LENNERSTRAND, G., & LUNDH, B. (1979). AGE VARIATIONS IN NORMAL HUMAN CONTRAST SENSITIVITY. Acta Ophthalmologica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1979.tb00517.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.