Cited by 137Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryMedical Research and Practices

Status of Psychotic Disorders in ICD-11

Open access
Gaebel, W.·2012·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

This editorial reflects the work of all of the members of the WHO Working Group on the Classification of Psychotic Disorders, which include Jonathan Burns (South Africa), Peter Falkai (Germany), Saeed Farooq (Pakistan), Wolfgang Gaebel, Chair (Germany), Silvana Galderisi (Italy), Philippa Garety (UK), Michael Green (USA), Assen Jablensky (Australia), Veronica Larach Walters (Chile), Toshimasa Maruta (Japan), and Pichet Udomratn (Thailand), assisted by WHO Secretariat members Geoffrey Reed and Shekhar Saxena and consultant Michael B. First. Jürgen Zielasek (Germany) is rapporteur for the Working Group. The views expressed in this editorial reflect the opinion of its author and, except as specifically noted, do not represent the official policies and positions of the Working Group, the Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders, or of WHO.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbs104

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]World Health Organization International classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th revision. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]World Health Organization Basic documents 46thed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  3. [12]First MB. Challenges in the implementation of diagnostic specifiers for mood disorders in ICD-11 World Psychiatry. in press. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaebel, W.
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
895-898
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2139963670
Cited by
137
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
Keywords
psychosis, ICD-11
MeSH terms
Disability Evaluation, Forecasting, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Prognosis, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, World Health Organization, International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review