Cited by 87Sodium Intake and HealthBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNutritional Studies and Diet

High Salt Intake and Stroke: Meta‐analysis of the Epidemiologic Evidence

Open access
Li, Xiu‐Yang, Cai, Xian‐Lei, Bian, Ping‐Da, Hu, Liu‐Ru·2012·CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics

Abstract

Research on the potential impact of high salt intake on health has grown rapidly over the last decades. Recent studies have suggested that high salt intake could also be associated with adverse effects on cardiovascular system. The review evaluated the current level of epidemiologic evidence on the association between the level of habitual salt intake and stroke outcome. We also suggest further research direction. There were 21 independent samples from 12 studies, with 225,693 participants (follow-up, 3-19 years) and 8135 stroke events. High salt intake was associated with risk of stroke event (pooled odd ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.51), stroke death (1.40; 1.21-1.63) and stroke onset (1.11; 1.00-1.24), ischemic stroke death (2.15; 1.57-2.95), not associated with risk of ischemic stroke onset (1.07, 0.95-1.2), with no significant evidence of publication bias. High salt intake is associated with significantly increased risk of stroke event. Further research should be directed toward clarifying and quantifying these possible effects and generating testable hypotheses on plausible biologic mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00355.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, X., Cai, X., Bian, P., & Hu, L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
  • Department of Clinic Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou China
  • Department of Cardiology Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital Hangzhou China
  • Chang'an University (CN)
Venue
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-28
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
691-701
ISSN
  • 1755-5930 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-5949
OpenAlex
W2005919711
Cited by
87
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Zhejiang University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
high-salt diet, stroke, stroke mortality, ischemic stroke, stroke onset, cardiovascular risk, dietary sodium, epidemiological evidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Confidence Intervals, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Sodium Chloride, Dietary, Risk Assessment, Stroke, International Classification of Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review