Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Misplaced Metaphor: A Critical Analysis of the “Knowledge Society”*

UNGAR, SHELDON·2003·Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie

Abstract

Cet article soutient que la métaphore de la société du savoir est une transposition non critique de L'économie du savoir. On y examine trois approches différentes: L'idée d'un citoyen bien informé, les mesures institutionnelles et les attentes sociales pour être bien informé ainsi que le rôle d'Internet dans sa prestation de renforcements critiques d'une société du savoir. Ces trois approches se révèlent sérieusement déficientes. L'article suggGre qu'une culture peu encline au savoir serait une meilleure métaphore dans la mesure où les processus sociaux créant un haut degré de spécialisation du savoir en milieu de travail peuvent servir à accroître L'ignorance dans la société en general. This paper argues that the knowledge society metaphor is an uncritical transposition from the knowledge economy. It examines three different approaches to the former. These include the idea of the well‐informed citizen, the institutional arrangements and social expectations for being knowledgeable, and the role of the Internet in providing critical underpinnings of a knowledge society. All three approaches are found to be seriously deficient. The paper suggests that a knowledge‐aversive culture may be a better metaphor, as the social processes creating a high degree of knowledge specialization in the workplace may serve to increase ignorance in the broader society.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-618x.2003.tb00250.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Barley S., 1997, Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in the United States
  2. Barnard R., 1998, Chips and Pop: Decoding the Nexus Generation
  3. 10.1515/9781400864355 · DOI
  4. Beniger J., 1986, The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society
  5. Bercuson D., 1997, Petrified Campus: The Crisis in Canada's Universities
  6. 10.1001/jama.285.20.2612 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Brint S., 1994, In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals and Experts in Politics and Public Life, 10.1515/9780691214535 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Castells M., 1996, The Information Age: Economy, Society &Culture, Vol. 1: The Rise of the Network Society
  9. Chandler A., 2000, A Nation Transformed by Information: How Information Shaped the United States from Colonial Times to the Present, 10.1093/oso/9780195127010.001.0001 · DOI
  10. Cowen T., 1998, Praise of Commercial Culture
  11. Kerckhove D., 1997, Connected Intelligence: The Arrival of the Web Society
  12. Denby D., 1996, Great Books
  13. Drucker R., 1993, Post‐Capitalist Society
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511583391 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Epstein S., 1996, Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge
  16. Erickson B., 1991, What is good taste good for, The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 28, 255, 10.1111/j.1755-618X.1991.tb00154.x · DOI
  17. 10.1007/BF00889070 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2307/2654314 · doi:10.2307/2654314
  19. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00775.x
  20. Halpern J., 1998, Debating Rationality: Nonrational Aspects of Organizational Decision Making
  21. 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Headrick D., 2000, When Information Came of Age: Technologies of Knowledge in the Age of Reason and Revolution
  23. Irwin‐Zarecka I., 1993, Frames of Remembrance: The Dynamics of Collective Memory
  24. Keegan J., 1998, The First World War
  25. Kingwell M., 1996, Dreams of Millennium: Report From a Culture on the Brink
  26. 10.2307/2091856 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Martin W., 1995, The Global Information Society
  28. Neuman W., 1986, The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate
  29. Owens B., 2000, Lifting the Fog of War
  30. 10.4159/9780674042278 · doi:10.4159/9780674042278
  31. 10.1145/358916.361990 · DOI
  32. Rauch J., 2001, The new old economy: Oil, computers and the reinvention of the earth, The Atlantic Monthly, 287, 35
  33. Ross A., 1989, No Respect: Intellectuals and Popular Culture
  34. Royce J., 1997, Surviving information overload: Lessons from the reading reluctance research, School Libraries Worldwide, 3, 39, 10.29173/slw7013 · DOI
  35. Scheuer J., 1999, The Sound Bite Society: Television and the American Mind
  36. Schiller H., 1999, Culture, Inc.: The Corporate Takeover of Public Expression
  37. 10.1007/BF00160753 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1985.tb00049.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.2307/2654990 · doi:10.2307/2654990
  40. 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1080/00071310120044980 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Ungar S., 2003, Stumped by headlines: Investigating a functional knowledge deficit among undergraduates, Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 32, 29, 10.47678/cjhe.v32i3.183418 · DOI
  43. 10.2307/2786715 · DOI
  44. Viswanath K., 1996, Communication Yearbook 19, 25
  45. 10.4324/9780203991367 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Worchel S., 2000, Social Psychology

Metadata

Authors
UNGAR, S.
Venue
Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
331-347
ISSN
  • 1755-6171
  • 1755-618X
Cited by
18
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Misplaced Metaphor: A Critical Analysis of the “Knowledge Society”*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-618x.2003.tb00250.x
The paper
UNGAR, S. (2003). Misplaced Metaphor: A Critical Analysis of the “Knowledge Society”*. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618x.2003.tb00250.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.