Cited by 6Social and Intergroup PsychologyAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyPsychology of Social Influence

Cognitive dissonance: fifty years of a classic theory

Covey, Martin A.·2009·Journal of Family Theory & Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00015.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Covey, M. A.
Affiliations
Spring Arbor University (US)
Corresponding author
Covey, Martin A.
Venue
Journal of Family Theory & Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
111-113
ISSN
  • 1756-2570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2589
OpenAlex
W2083346214
Cited by
6
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Family Theory & Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
cognitive dissonance, dissonance theory, attitude change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review