The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Communication Privacy Management Theory: What Do We Know About Family Privacy Regulation?
Abstract
For families, managing private information is challenging. Family members reveal too much, they allow more privacy access to outsiders than others desire, parents attempt to negotiate Internet disclosures with their teens, and family health issues often change the way private information is defined altogether. The complexities of privacy regulation call for a systematic way to grasp how privacy management operates in families. This article presents the evidenced‐based theory of communication privacy management (CPM) and corresponding research on family privacy regulation that provides a road map to understand the multifaceted nature of managing private information (Petronio, 2002). The article discusses contributions of CPM to conceptualizing privacy in meaningful ways, along with current research trends and future directions for CPM research and theorizing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MINUCHIN, S. (1974) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674041127 · Cited by 4,600
Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure
Petronio, S. (2002) · doi:10.1353/book4588 · Cited by 1,533
Self-citationAdolescent Relations with Mothers, Fathers, and Friends.
Dager, E. Z., Youniss, J., & Smollar, J. (1986) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2069267 · Cited by 1,219
Family Therapy: Concepts and Methods
Brock, G. W., Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1996) · Family Relations · doi:10.2307/585510 · Cited by 1,050
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-1562 · Cited by 820
Handbook of communication and emotion: research, theory, applications, and contexts
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-5367 · Cited by 706
Handbook of family communication
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4963 · Cited by 643
Petronio, S. (1991) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1991.tb00023.x · Cited by 534
Self-citationLoss, Trauma, and Resilience: Therapeutic Work With Ambiguous Loss
BOSS, P. G. (2006) · Cited by 472
Voicing Relationships: A Dialogic Perspective
Baxter, L. (2011) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452230344 · Cited by 460
Cited by
Brief Status Report on Communication Privacy Management Theory
Petronio, S. (2013) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.743426 · Cited by 277
Self-citationParental Control vs. Teen Self-Regulation: Is there a middle ground for mobile online safety?
Wisniewski, P., Ghosh, A. K., Xu, H., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2998181.2998352 · Cited by 206
Self‐Censorship as a Socio‐Political‐Psychological Phenomenon: Conception and Research
Bar‐Tal, D. (2017) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12391 · Cited by 127
Empirical Examination of Information Privacy Concerns Instrument in the Social Media Context
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, & Osatuyi, B. (2015) · AIS Transactions on Replication Research · doi:10.17705/1atrr.00003 · Cited by 32
Rafferty, K. A., Hutton, K., & Heller, S. (2019) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1384432 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Petronio, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Family Theory & Review
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-08-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-196
- ISSN
- 1756-2570 (ISSN-L)
- 1756-2589
- OpenAlex
- W1993161429
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 34.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Communication Privacy Management Theory: What Do We Know About Family Privacy Regulation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00052.x
- The paper
- Petronio, S. (2010). Communication Privacy Management Theory: What Do We Know About Family Privacy Regulation? Journal of Family Theory & Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00052.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
