Cited by 127Law, Rights, and FreedomsFreedom of Expression and DefamationMedia Influence and Politics

Self‐Censorship as a Socio‐Political‐Psychological Phenomenon: Conception and Research

Bar‐Tal, Daniel·2017·Political Psychology

Abstract

Self‐censorship of information, defined as an act of intentionally and voluntarily withholding information from others in the absence of formal obstacles, serves as an obstacle to the proper functioning of a democratic society, because it prevents free access to information, freedom of expression, and the flow of information. It is of key importance in societies, as it blocks information that may shed new light on various societal issues. Nevertheless, it is recognized that in certain cases self‐censorship is necessary. The present article provides a comprehensive conceptual framework for self‐censorship and examines it from various angles with empirical examples. It describes its nature and psychological foundations, the motivations that underlie it, the conditions that facilitate its practice, its societal and individual consequences, and, finally, its measurement challenges.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/pops.12391

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective disclosure could result in pluralistic ignorance because only certain political views are expressed, and disagreement is suppressed.

    “This could result in pluralistic ignorance (an exaggerated appearance of homogeneity) because only certain political views are expressed, and disagreement is suppressed233–236.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Bar‐Tal, D.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Bar‐Tal, Daniel
Venue
Political Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-01-26
Volume
38
Issue
S1
Pages
37-65
ISSN
  • 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9221
OpenAlex
W2579924179
Cited by
127
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
18.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Law, Rights, and Freedoms
  • Social Sciences › Law › Freedom of Expression and Defamation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
self-censorship, freedom of expression, access to information, democratic society, motivation, social consequences, information flow

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review