Cited by 175Bioenergy crop production and managementBiofuel production and bioconversionCrop Yield and Soil Fertility

Seasonal dynamics of above‐ and below‐ground biomass and nitrogen partitioning in M iscanthus × giganteus and P anicum virgatum across three growing seasons

Open access
Dohleman, Frank G., Heaton, Emily A., Arundale, Rebecca A., Long, Stephen P.·2012·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

The first replicated productivity trials of the C 4 perennial grass M iscanthus × giganteus in the U nited S tates showed this emerging ligno‐cellulosic bioenergy feedstock to provide remarkably high annual yields. This covered the 5 years after planting, leaving it uncertain if this high productivity could be maintained in the absence of N fertilization. An expected, but until now unsubstantiated, benefit of both species was investment in roots and perennating rhizomes. This study examines for years 5–7 yields, biomass, C and N in shoots, roots, and rhizomes. The mean peak shoot biomass for M. × giganteus in years 5–7 was 46.5 t ha−1 in O ctober, declining to 38.1 t ha−1 on completion of senescence and at harvest in D ecember, and 20.7 t ha−1 declining to 11.3 t ha−1 for P anicum virgatum. There was no evidence of decline in annual yield with age. Mean rhizome biomass was significantly higher in M. × giganteus at 21.5 t ha−1 compared to 7.2 t ha−1 for P. virgatum, whereas root biomass was similar at 5.6–5.9 t ha−1. M. × giganteus shoots contained 339 kg ha−1 N in A ugust, declining to 193 kg ha−1 in D ecember, compared to 168 and 58 kg ha−1 for P. virgatum. The results suggest substantial remobilization of N to roots and rhizomes, yet still a substantial loss with D ecember harvests. The shoot and rhizome biomass increase of 33.6 t ha−1 during the 2‐month period between J une and A ugust for M. × giganteus corresponds to a solar energy conversion of 4.4% of solar energy into biomass, one of the highest recorded and confirming the remarkable productivity potential of this plant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01153.x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For switchgrass, more carbon was allocated to the roots than to the rhizomes.

    “For switchgrass, more C was allocated to the roots than to the rhizomes [25, 66, 71].”
  • Due to differences in stand age, depth and sampling frequency, belowground biomass inputs appear very variable.

    “Due to differences in stand age, depth and sampling frequency inputs appear very variable [65, 66, 84].”
  • Belowground biomass is concentrated in the upper part of the profile; despite large amounts of roots under M. giganteus observed down to 1 to 1.8 m, more than 50% were in the top 30 cm.

    “BGB is concentrated in the upper part of the profile [61]; in spite of large amounts of roots under M. giganteus observed down to 1 to 1.8 m [57, 61, 66, 80, 84], more than 50 % were in the top 30 cm.”
  • Carbon inputs from Miscanthus rhizomes (1.01 to 2.66 Mg C ha−1 year−1) were generally greater than those from roots (0.19-0.86 Mg C ha−1 year−1).

    “The C inputs from Miscanthus rhizomes (1.01 to 2.66 Mg C ha−1 year−1) were generally greater [57, 61, 66, 80, 85] than those from roots (0.19–0.86 Mg C ha−1 year−1, Table 1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dohleman, F. G., Heaton, E. A., Arundale, R. A., & Long, S. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Iowa State University (US)
Corresponding author
Long, Stephen P.
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-16
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
534-544
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2038066255
Cited by
175
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
FWCI
41.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
Keywords
Miscanthus × giganteus, switchgrass, perennial grasses, seasonal biomass dynamics, nitrogen partitioning, rhizome biomass, root biomass, nitrogen remobilization, shoot biomass, solar energy conversion efficiency, yield stability, nitrogen fertilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review