Cited by 17Electroconvulsive Therapy StudiesHealthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsSchizophrenia research and treatment

Electroconvulsive therapy without consent from patients: One-year follow-up study: ECT without consent from patients

Chiu, Nien-Mu, Lee, Yu, Lee, Wen-Kuei·2014·Asia-Pacific Psychiatry

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: No previous study has been designed to analyze the reasons for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) without patients' consent. In the present study we compared the clinical characteristics and one-year outcomes between patients with refusal to undergo ECT and patients without competency for ECT consent. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 29 patients were treated with ECT without providing consent between 1 January 2006 and 31 August 2010. A surrogate family member gave informed consent for ECT to meet current legal requirements. Patients were assigned to one of two groups: a consent-refusal group comprising patients who refused to give consent for ECT and could clearly say "no" or argue with psychiatric staff about receiving ECT; and a consent-incompetent group comprising patients who were incompetent for consent but underwent ECT passively or reluctantly without argument. RESULTS: The patients were clinically diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder (n = 6), psychotic disorder (n = 12), bipolar I disorder (n = 8) and major depressive disorder with psychotic features (n = 3). The consent-incompetent patients had longer hospital stays and more recurrence in one year than the consent-refusal patients, which may be because the former group had more psychotic disorders and fewer mood disorders. All patients improved rapidly and efficiently. However, remission was temporal in two-thirds of patients and the rehospitalization rate in one year was 66% (n = 19). DISCUSSION: ECT can be applied early, emergently and successfully to patients who have a wide range of psychiatric disorders and life-threatening conditions without threat of lawsuits, even during their first hospitalization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1758-5872.2012.00203.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiu, N.-M., Lee, Y., & Lee, W.-K.
Affiliations
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Department of Psychiatry; Armed Forces Beitou Hospital; Taipei Taiwan
Corresponding author
Chiu, Nien-Mu
Venue
Asia-Pacific Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-18
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
1758-5864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1847393604
Cited by
17
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Asia-Pacific Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
electroconvulsive therapy, informed consent, treatment refusal, surrogate consent, decisional incapacity, psychosis, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder with psychotic features, schizoaffective disorder, hospital readmission, remission, one-year outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Taiwan, Mental Competency, Age of Onset, Third-Party Consent, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review