Cited by 34E-Government and Public ServicesSecurity, Politics, and Digital TransformationPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Global identity policies and technology: do we understand the question?

Open access
Whitley, Edgar A., Hosein, Gus·2010·Global Policy

Abstract

Why do we get technology policy so wrong, so often? As governments rush to develop new identity policies they fail too often in answering essential questions: are identity policies capable of addressing a diverse range of policy goals? Are the techniques we imagine to be necessary in fact helpful? Instead, policy makers remain fixated on expensive and sexy ‘biometrics’ and vast new centralised databases to solve problems they do not understand. This survey seeks to resolve why policy makers repeatedly commission identity schemes based on obsolete knowledge of modern technological capabilities. We argue that policy making requires an understanding of technological issues as well as more traditional political and organisational concerns, and a little less bravado. As a result, policy makers can set about developing effective solutions that are citizen friendly and actually address pressing policy goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1758-5899.2010.00028.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Centralized identity systems are generally expensive and bureaucratic, likely politically impractical for migrants, and subject to high privacy, data abuse, and cybersecurity risks.

    “Such a system is generally expensive and bureaucratic, likely politically impractical for the use case of migrants (especially for vulnerable populations on the move), and subject to high privacy, data abuse, and cybersecurity risks (Whitley and Hosein, 2010).”

    From Self-Sovereign Identity in a Globalized World: Credentials-Based Identity Systems as a Driver for Economic Inclusion (2020) · cites this paper as Whitley and Hosein, 2010

    The challenge of implementation (page unavailable) describes centralized databases as targets for hackers and at risk of catastrophic breaches, exclusion through errors, and abuse through fraudulent registration. The paper also describes coordination burdens and calls some identity policies a potential financial and political liability. It does not establish that centralized systems are generally expensive and bureaucratic or that they are politically impractical specifically for migrants and vulnerable people on the move. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smith, A. and Clarke, R. (2000) 'Identification, Authentication and Anonymity in a Legal Context', Computer Law and Security Report, 16 (2), pp. 95-100.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitley, E. A., & Hosein, G.
Affiliations
London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Venue
Global Policy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
209-215
ISSN
  • 1758-5880 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5899
OpenAlex
W2136004761
Cited by
34
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Global Policy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
identity policy, technology policy, biometrics, policy making, technological capabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review