Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alternative Systems of Inquiry for a Sustainable Agriculture

Open access
Pretty, Jules N·1994·IDS Bulletin

Abstract

Summary Scientific investigation has long been dominated by positivism, which holds that an independent reality driven by immutable laws exists. Consequently, it should be possible to define sustainability in absolute terms. Advances in alternative paradigms, however, suggest: that any attempt precisely to define sustainability is flawed; that problems are always open to interpretation; that the resolution of one problem inevitably leads to the production of another ‘problem-situation’, as problems are endemic; that the key feature now becomes the capacity of actors continually to learn about these changing conditions, so that they can act rapidly to transform existing activities; and that systems of learning and inquiry are needed to seek the multiple perspectives of the various stakeholders and encourage wider involvement and action. These systems of inquiry are participatory in nature, and the information and action arising from them is judged by a framework of trustworthiness criteria. Resumé Les systèmes de renseignement alternatifs pour l'agriculture durable Depuis longtemps, l'enquête scientifique se trouve dominée par le positivisme, qui maintient l'existence d'une réalité indépendante mue par des lois ellesmêmes immuables. Par conséquent, il devrait être possible de définir la durabilité dans des termes absolus. Toutefois, les progrès au niveau des paradigmes alternatifs auraient tendance à suggérer, d'abord, que toute tentative de définir la durabilité de manière précise est à priori fausse; ensuite, que tout problème est capable d'interprétations différentes; que la solution d'un problème mène inéluctablement à la production de situations problématiques, étant donné que les problèmes sont endémiques; que le facteur primordial est désormais, la capacité des acteurs à apprendre continûment quelles sont ces situations changeantes, de sorte qu'ils puissent agir rapidement pour transformer les activités existantes; et que la mise en place de systèmes d'enquête et d'acquisition des connaissances sont nécessaires afin que l'on puisse interroger les nombreuses perspectives des divers participants et par là, encourager une participation plus grande et plus active. Ces systèmes d'enquète sont intrinsèquement participatoires, aussi l'information et l'action qui en découlent doiventelles être jugées dans le cadre d'un ensemble de critères de fiabilité. Resumen Sistemas alternativos de investigación para una agricultura sostenible La investigación científica ha sido dominada durante mucho tiempo por el positivismo, que mantiene la existencia de una realidad independiente manejada por leyes inmutables. Consecuentemente, debe ser posible definir el mantenimiento en términos absolutos. Sin embargo, el avance de paradigmas alternativos sugiere: a) cualquier intento de definir la sostenibilidad con precisión es defectuoso; b) los problemas siempre están abiertos a la interpretación; c) la solución de un problema inevitablemente lleva a la producción de otra situación problemática, ya que los problemas son endémicos; d) el rasgo clave es la capacidad de los protagonistas para aprender continuamente de estas condiciónes cambiantes, y poder actuar rápidamente en la transformación de las actividades existentes; y e) se necesitan sistemas de averiguación y aprendizaje para registrar las múltiples perspectivas de las varias partes interesadas y estimular un compromiso y una acción mas emplios. Estos sistemas de averiguación son de por sí participatorios, y la información y acción que de ellos surgen son juzgadas por un conjunto de criterios de fiabilidad.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1759-5436.1994.mp25002004.x

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 287

Metadata

Authors
Pretty, J. N.
Venue
IDS Bulletin
Published
1994-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
37-49
ISSN
  • 0265-5012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-5436
OpenAlex
W2141654219
Cited by
287
References
30
FWCI
18.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alternative Systems of Inquiry for a Sustainable Agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1994.mp25002004.x
The paper
Pretty, J. N. (1994). Alternative Systems of Inquiry for a Sustainable Agriculture. IDS Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1994.mp25002004.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.