Cited by 36Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainability and Ecological Systems AnalysisWater Resources and Sustainability

Blue, Green, and Grey Water Quantification Approaches: A Bibliometric and Literature Review

Open access
Mubako, Stanley T.·2018·Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Abstract

An array of methodologies to quantify blue, green, and grey water have emerged in recent years and are still evolving rapidly, as are efforts to come up with reliable indicators of human appropriation of freshwater resources. This study provides an overview of recent blue, green, and grey water quantification approaches by analyzing publications extracted from the Web of Science database utilizing the Network Analysis Interface for Literature Studies (NAILS) bibliometric analysis tool, covering the period 2000–2018. A steep increase in the number of blue, green, and grey water publications was observed from the year 2009, with the United States and China among the top contributing nations. Blue, green, and grey water quantification approaches used in the analyzed publications were broadly categorized into Water Footprint Assessment, Life Cycle Assessment, and Hybrid methodologies. The Water Footprint Network was the most influential hub in terms of providing the most productive and cited authors. “Water footprint” and “virtual water” were unsurprisingly the trendiest and most cited keywords associated with the sample of analyzed publications. The study provides important insights that are helpful in understanding the diversity of techniques that have been applied to quantify blue, green, and grey water in recent assessment studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1936-704x.2018.03289.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mubako, S. T.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Corresponding author
Mubako, Stanley T.
Venue
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-12
Volume
165
Issue
1
Pages
4-19
ISSN
  • 1936-7031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-704X
OpenAlex
W2908289920
Cited by
36
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education (publishedVersion)
  • OpenSIUC (Southern Illinois University Carbondale) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resources and Sustainability
Keywords
blue water, green water, greywater, water footprint assessment, life cycle assessment, virtual water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review