The DOI matches its Crossref record.
MANUFACTURING STRATEGY ON THE “S” CURVE
Abstract
The concept and techniques of “manufacturing strategy” offer managers the opportunity to use their production function as a strategic weapon in competition, an apparently attractive objective. Yet after about 25 years, the use of manufacturing in corporate strategy (MCS) as a management practice is not widespread. In contrast, however, in academic literature it appears to be flourishing and rapidly growing in popularity. This paper seeks to answer this apparent paradox, beginning with the history of MCS as it was developed as a theory of design to enable a manufacturing system to be focused on a key competitive task. Common criticisms of MCS, such as “tradeoffs,” “focus” and “undynamic,” are examined and refuted as valid reasons for its only modest usage. Instead, three “new” problems in the MCS concept and its techniques are suggested as genuine needs for the completion of the theory and for its becoming more universally understood and used by industrial managers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sustainable Operations Management
Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & VanWassenhove, L. N. (2005) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2005.tb00235.x · Cited by 1,746
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
A critical investigation of Industry 4.0 in manufacturing: theoretical operationalisation framework
Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2018) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2018.1424960 · Cited by 522
Manufacturing strategy: Literature review and some issues
Dangayach, G. S., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570110393414 · Cited by 469
Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. (2005) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2005.00079.x · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Skinner, W.
- Venue
- Production and Operations Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-01-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 1059-1478 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-5956
- OpenAlex
- W1986303867
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MANUFACTURING STRATEGY ON THE “S” CURVE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1996.tb00381.x
- The paper
- Skinner, W. (1996). MANUFACTURING STRATEGY ON THE “S” CURVE. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1996.tb00381.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.