The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Passive Transfer of Colostral Immunoglobulins in Calves
Abstract
Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins has long been accepted as imperative to optimal calf health. Many factors, including timing of colostrum ingestion, the method and volume of colostrum administration, the immunoglobulin concentration of the colostrum ingested, and the age of the dam have been implicated in affecting the optimization of absorption. The practice of colostrum pooling, the breed and presence of the dam, and the presence of respiratory acidosis in the calf also may affect passive transfer. Various tests have been reported to accurately measure passive transfer status in neonatal calves. The radial immunodif-fusion and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) are the only tests that directly measure serum IgG concentration. All other available tests including serum total solids by refractometry, sodium sulfite turbidity test, zinc sulfate turbidity test, serum γ-glutamyl transferase activity, and whole blood glutaraldehyde gelation estimate serum IgG concentration based on concentration of total globulins or other proteins whose passive transfer is statistically associated with that of IgG. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the literature of passive transfer in calves including factors that affect passive transfer status, testing modalities, effects of failure of passive transfer on baseline mortality, consequences of failure of passive transfer, and some treatment options. Many previously accepted truisms regarding passive transfer in calves should be rejected based on the results of recent research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Windeyer, M. C., Leslie, K. E., Godden, S. M., Hodgins, D. C., Lissemore, K. D., & LeBlanc, S. J. (2014) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.10.019 · Cited by 541
An evaluation of Brix refractometry instruments for measurement of colostrum quality in dairy cattle
Bielmann, V., Gillan, J., Perkins, N. R., Skidmore, A. L., Godden, S., & Leslie, K. E. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2009-2943 · Cited by 301
Pardon, B., Alliët, J., Boone, R., Roelandt, S., Valgaeren, B., & Deprez, P. (2015) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.04.009 · Cited by 116
Oliveira, R. A., Narciso, C. D., Bisinotto, R. S., Perdomo, M. C., Ballou, M. A., Dreher, M., & Santos, J. E. P. (2010) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3314 · Cited by 114
Cramer, M. C., & Ollivett, T. L. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15420 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Weaver, D. M., Tyler, J. W., VanMetre, D. C., Hostetler, D. E., & Barrington, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 569-577
- ISSN
- 0891-6640 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1676
- OpenAlex
- W2017648830
- Cited by
- 826
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Passive Transfer of Colostral Immunoglobulins in Calves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2000.tb02278.x
- The paper
- Weaver, D. M., Tyler, J. W., VanMetre, D. C., Hostetler, D. E., & Barrington, G. M. (2000). Passive Transfer of Colostral Immunoglobulins in Calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2000.tb02278.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.