The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Spaces and Times of Globalization: Place, Scale, Networks, and Positionality*
Abstract
Abstract: Discussions of the spatiality of globalization have largely focused on place‐based attributes that fix globalization locally, on globalization as the construction of scale, and on networks as a distinctive feature of contemporary globalization. By contrast, position within the global economy is frequently regarded as anachronistic in a shrinking, networked world. A critical review of how place, scale, and networks are used as metaphors for the spatiality of globalization suggests that space/time still matters. Positionality (position in relational space/time within the global economy) is conceptualized as both shaping and shaped by the trajectories of globalization and as influencing the conditions of possibility of places in a globalizing world. The wormhole is invoked as a way of describing the concrete geographies of positionality and their non‐Euclidean relationship to the Earth's surface. The inclusion of positionality challenges the simplicity of pro‐ and antiglobalization narratives and can change how we think about globalization and devise strategies to alter its trajectory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity
Law, J. (1992) · Systems Practice · doi:10.1007/bf01059830 · Cited by 3,244
The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory
Agnew, J. (1994) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692299408434268 · Cited by 2,549
Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics
Rose, G. (1997) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/030913297673302122 · Cited by 2,390
SOJA, E. W. (1980) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x · Cited by 901
Wade, R. (1996) · New Left Review · doi:10.64590/84t · Cited by 132
Cited by
Theorizing Sociospatial Relations
Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d9107 · Cited by 1,252
Urban land teleconnections and sustainability
Seto, K. C., Reenberg, A., Boone, C. G., Fragkias, M., Haase, D., Langanke, T., Marcotullio, P., Munroe, D. K., Olah, B., & Simon, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1117622109 · Cited by 905
The Routledge international handbook of the sociology of education
(2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203863701 · Cited by 600
Advanced Producer Service Firms as Strategic Networks, Global Cities as Strategic Places
Taylor, P. J., Derudder, B., Faulconbridge, J., Hoyler, M., & Ni, P. (2014) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/ecge.12040 · Cited by 175
Beyond Upgrading: Gendered Labor and the Restructuring of Firms in the Dominican Republic
Werner, M. (2012) · Economic Geography · doi:10.1111/j.1944-8287.2012.01163.x · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheppard, E.
- Venue
- Economic Geography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 307-330
- ISSN
- 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8287
- OpenAlex
- W2108199420
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 50.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.