The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laser probe argon‐40/argon‐39 dating of pseudotachylyte from the Sudbury Structure: Evidence for postimpact thermal overprinting in the North Range
Abstract
Abstract— Ten pseudotachylyte samples from the North Range of the 1850 Ma Sudbury impact structure have been analyzed by the 40 Ar/39 Ar laser spot fusion method. Field and petrological evidence indicate that the pseudotachylytes were formed at 1850 Ma by comminution and frictional melting due to impact‐induced faulting. The cryptocrystalline to microcrystalline grain size (<30 μm) of the pseudotachylyte matrices and the predominance of orthoclase as the main K‐bearing phase, have rendered the rocks particularly susceptible to Ar loss. The age determinations range from ∼1850 to ∼1000 Ma, with some samples yielding multiple ages that cannot be correlated with known geological events in the area. However, if the finite‐difference algorithm of Wheeler (1996) is used to calculate combined Ar loss and the accumulation of radiogenic Ar for the K‐bearing phases, it is possible to reproduce the range of observed ages. The model infers that the long‐term volume diffusion of Ar has occurred and that, as a result, the Ar system cannot be treated with a conventional closure temperature approach. The algorithm requires burial of the impact structure to 5–6 km depth and 160–180 °C at 1850 Ma, followed by exhumation at ∼1000 Ma. These ages may be equated with two events: Penokean thin‐skinned overthrusting in the North Range, immediately following impact, and exhumation ∼850 Ma later, coincident with the Grenville orogeny to the southeast. The results suggest that, contrary to previously accepted paradigms, the North Range has been affected by a protracted period of postimpact, low‐grade thermal metamorphism. If these events also involved tectonic shortening within the North Range (as has been documented for the South Range), then the original size of the Sudbury impact structure has been underestimated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The apparent crater diameter (~260 km) approximates the final rim diameter, given that erosion in the North Range is <6 km and the ring faults are steeply dipping.
“This approximates the final rim diameter, given that erosion in the North Range is <6 km and the ring faults are steeply dipping.”
From Tectonic influences on the morphometry of the Sudbury impact structure: Implications for terrestrial cratering and modeling (2004) · cites this paper as Thompson et al. 1998
The apparent crater diameter is approximately coincident with the final rim diameter Dfr, because erosion in the North Range since impact is relatively minor (<6 km) and the concentric fault systems appear to dip steeply.
“Because the amount of erosion in the North Range since impact is relatively minor (<6 km; Thompson et al. 1998), and because the concentric fault systems appear to dip steeply, we suggest that the apparent crater diameter is approximately coincident with the final rim diameter D fr .”
From Tectonic influences on the morphometry of the Sudbury impact structure: Implications for terrestrial cratering and modeling (2004) · cites this paper as Thompson et al. 1998
Citations
Cites
Zolnai, A. I., Price, R. A., & Helmstaedt, H. (1984) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/e84-048 · Cited by 90
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 58
- Bennett G., 1991, Geology of Ontario, 549
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1986)14<492:PHOTMR>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-821X(93)90149-4 · DOI
- CardK. D.(1992)Circa 1.75 Ga ages for plutonic rocks from the Southern Province and adjacent Grenville Province: What is the expression of the Penokean Orogeny?:Discussion. InRadiogenic Age and Isotopic Studies pp.227–228. Report 6 Geol. Surv. Can. Paper 92–2.. · DOI
- Card K. D., 1994, Geology of the Levack gneiss complex, the northern footwall of the Sudbury structure, Ontario, Current Research, 269
- Card K. D., 1981, Geology of the Benny area, District of Sudbury, Ontario Geol. Survey, Report, 206, 117
- Cowan E. J., 1994, Ontario Geological Survey, 45
- 10.1139/e86-011 · DOI
- Davidson A., 1992, Radiogenic Age and hotopic Studies, 107
- Dence M. R., 1972, New Developments in Sudbury Geology, 7
- Deutsch A., 1994, Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution, 289
- 10.1007/s005310050034 · DOI
- 10.1086/626999 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00373790 · DOI · Paper page
- Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
- Easton R. M., 1992, Geology of Ontario, 715
- 10.1139/e69-045 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-7037(74)90200-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.156.3778.1094 · DOI
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0268:DOAMCO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/91JE02513 · DOI · Paper page
- Guy‐Bray J. and Geological Staff, 1966, Shatter cones at Sudbury, J. Geol., 74, 243, 10.1086/627158 · DOI
- HaggartM. J. JamiesonR. A. ReynoldsP. H. CulshawN. G. KroghT. E.andBeaumontC.(1992)The Grenville's last gasp‐Thermochronology of the Grenville Front Tectonic Zone near Killarney Ontario (abstract).1992 Grenville Workshop 17.
- 10.1016/0016-7037(85)90246-7 · DOI
- Heaman L. M., 1989, U‐Pb dating of mafic dyke swarms: What are the options? (abstract), Int. Assoc. Volcan. Chem. Earth's Interior, Congress Abstracts, New Mexico Bureau Mines Min. Res. Bull., 131, 125
- 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90212-5 · DOI
- Jackson S. L., 1991, Geology of Ontario, 405
- 10.1111/j.1525-1314.1992.tb00087.x · DOI · Paper page
- Kellett R. L., 1996, Characterization of the Benny deformation zone, Sudbury, Ontario, Can. J. Earth Sci., 33, 1256, 10.1139/e96-095 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4615-2053-5_8 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1994)022<0443:LPAAIO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- Krogh T. E., 1989, Terrane identification in the Grenville Province from detrital and metamorphic zircon ages, 63
- Krogh T. E., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 431
- Krogh T. E., 1987, Mafic Dyke Swarms, 147
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1990.tb00997.x · DOI · Paper page
- Medaris L. G., 1983, Geology of the Great Lakes Region, 1
- 10.1016/S0301-9268(96)00055-1 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1992)020<0807:DGOTSS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- Peredery W. V., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 491
- 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00289-5 · DOI
- Rex D. C., 1995, Phanerozoic Time Scale, 21
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1997)109<0841:MCDATS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/93GL02044 · DOI
- 10.1016/0168-9622(87)90025-X · DOI
- Schandl E. S., 1994, Albitization at 1700 ± 2 Ma in the Sudbury‐Wanapitei Lake area, Ontario: Implications for deep‐seated alkalic magmatism in the Southern Province, Can. J. Earth Sci., 31, 597, 10.1139/e94-052 · DOI
- 10.1139/e91-037 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1119:PCFOF>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0579:S>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1038/373130a0 · DOI · Paper page
- StockwellC. H.(1982)Proposals for time classification and correlation of Precambrian rocks and events in Canada and adjacent areas of the Canadian Shield. InA Time Classification of Precambrian Rocks and Events pp.49–78. Geol. Surv. Can. Paper 80–19 Part 1. · DOI
- ThompsonL. M.(1996)A study of pseudotachylyte associated with the Sudbury Structure Ontario Canada.Unpublished Ph.D. thesis University of New Brunswick Canada.202pp.
- Thompson L. M., 1994, Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution, 275
- 10.1007/s004100050228 · DOI
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1988)100<0630:NEOPTO>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- Schmus W. R., 1976, Early and middle Proterozoic history of the Great Lakes area, North America, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, 280, 606
- 10.1016/S0098-3004(96)00061-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1993.tb00760.x · DOI
- 10.1139/e94-147 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Spray, J. G., Butler, H. R., & Thompson, L. M. (2004) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00341.x · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- THOMPSON, L. M., SPRAY, J. G., & KELLEY, S. P.
- Venue
- Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1259-1269
- ISSN
- 1086-9379
- 1945-5100
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review