The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chicxulub central crater structure: Initial results from physical property measurements and combined velocity and gravity modeling
Abstract
Abstract The Chicxulub crater in Mexico is a nearly pristine example of a large impact crater. Its slow burial has left the central impact basin intact, within which there is an apparently uneroded topographic peak ring. Its burial, however, means that we must rely on drill holes and geophysical data to interpret the crater form. Interpretations of crater structures using geophysical data are often guided by numerical modeling and observations at other large terrestrial craters. However, such endeavors are hindered by uncertainties in current numerical models and the lack of any obvious progressive change in structure with increasing crater size. For this reason, proposed structural models across Chicxulub remain divergent, particularly within the central crater region, where the deepest well is only ˜1.6 km deep. The shape and precise location of the stratigraphic uplift are disputed. The spatial extent and distribution of the allogenic impact breccias and melt rocks remain unknown, as do the lithological nature of the peak ring and the mechanism for its formation. The objective of our research is to provide a well‐constrained 3D structural and lithological model across the central region of the Chicxulub crater that is consistent with combined geophysical data sets and drill core samples. With this in mind, we present initial physical property measurements made on 18 core samples from the Yaxcopoil‐1 (Yax‐1) drill hole between 400 and 1500 m deep and present a new density model that is in agreement with both the 3D velocity and gravity data. Future collation of petrophysical and geochemical data from Yax‐1 core, as well as further seismic surveys and drilling, will allow us to calibrate our geophysical models—assigning a suite of physical properties to each lithology. An accurate 3D model of Chicxulub is critical to our understanding of large craters and to the constraining of the environmental effects of this impact.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gravity data over the structural uplift at Chicxulub cannot uniquely constrain its shape and many models will fit the gravity data equally as well.
“Additional gravity modeling by Vermeesch and Morgan (2004) showed that gravity data over the structural uplift at Chicxulub cannot uniquely constrain its shape and that many models will fit the gravity data equally as well.”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Vermeesch and Morgan 2004
Based on the above reasoning, the gravity expression of the entire structural uplift at Chicxulub actually has a diameter of 70-80 km, which is more consistent with that derived from the seismic interpretation.
“Based on the above reasoning, the gravity expression of the entire structural uplift at Chicxulub actually has a diameter of 70-80 km, which is more consistent with that derived from the seismic interpretation (Morgan et al. 2000;Vermeesch and Morgan 2004;Vermeesch 2006).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Vermeesch and Morgan 2004
Inward of the dipping reflectors at Chicxulub is a low-velocity zone with similar inward dip, interpreted as megabreccia or fractured basement of the structural uplift.
“Inward of the dipping reflectors is the low-velocity zone with a similar inward dip (Morgan et al. 2000), which is interpreted to be due to a megabreccia or fractured basement of the structural uplift (Vermeesch and Morgan 2004).”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Vermeesch and Morgan 2004
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 55
- Alexopoulos J. S., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 29
- Anderson R. R., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 237
- Bell C., Stratigraphic and sedimentological observations from seismic data across the Chicxulub impact basin, Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- Camargo‐Zanoguera A., 1994, Evidencia sísmica del cráter impacto de Chicxulub, Boletín de la Asociación Mexicana de Geofísicos de Exploración, 34, 1
- 10.1190/1.1444455 · DOI
- 10.1190/1.9781560802624 · DOI
- 10.1130/0-8137-2339-6.291 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001JB000337 · DOI
- 10.1006/icar.2002.6822 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/2003EO140001 · DOI
- Deutsch A., 2004, Deep drilling in the Puchezh‐Katunki impact structure, Russia., 392
- 10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00005-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-9201(95)03022-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1190/1.1440465 · DOI
- Gassmann F., 1951, Über die Elastizität Poröser Medien, Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 96, 1
- Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Multi‐ring basins, 37
- 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90152-V · DOI
- 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.140.01.10 · DOI
- Grieve R. A. F., 1999, Encyclopedia of the solar system, 845
- 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00336.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.140.01.12 · DOI · Paper page
- Ivanov B. A., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 81
- 10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.619 · DOI
- 10.1007/BFb0027764 · DOI
- Kenkmann T., 2004, Structure and impact indicators of the Cretaceous sequence of the ICDP drill core Yaxcopoil‐1, Chicxulub impact crater, Mexico, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb01129.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0148-9062(97)00331-8 · DOI
- 10.1190/1.1451700 · DOI
- Ludwig W. J., 1979, The Sea, 53
- Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact cratering: A geologic process., 245
- 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.385 · DOI
- Morgan, J. V., Warner M., The Chicxulub Working Group, 1997, Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater, Nature, 390, 472, 10.1038/37291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0407:CTTDOA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00307-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00143-9 · DOI
- Morgan J. V., 2002, Catastrophic events and mass extinctions: Impact and beyond, 39
- 10.1029/1998JE000596 · DOI
- OstermannM.1996.Die Geochemie der Impaktschmelzdecke (Sudbury igneous complex) im Multiring‐Becken Sudbury.Ph.D. thesis University of Munster Munster Germany.
- Picket G. R., 1963, Acoustic character logs and their applications in formation evaluation, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 15, 659, 10.2118/452-PA · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00263-5 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB088iB03p02500 · DOI
- 10.1029/94JE01089 · DOI · Paper page
- Poag C. W., 2004, The Cheaspeake Bay crater—Geology and geophysics of a late Eocene submarine impact structure., 522
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00052.x · DOI · Paper page
- Pösges G., 1994, Das Rieskrater‐Museum Nördlingen, Akademiebericht Nr. 253 Bayerische Akademie für Lehrerfortbildung Dillingen.
- 10.1190/1.1444249 · DOI
- Smit J., 2004, Is the transition impact to post‐impact rock complete? Some remarks based on XRF scanning, electron microbe, and thin section analyses of the Yaxcopoil‐1 core in the Chicxulub crater, Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
- Sharpton V. L., 1996, The Cretaceous‐Tertiary event and other catastrophes in Earth history, 55
- 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00255.x · DOI
- Tsikalas F., 1998, The anatomy of the buried complex impact structure: The Mjølnir structure, Barents Sea, Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 30469, 10.1029/97JB03389 · DOI
- 10.1029/96GL01566 · DOI
- Visnevsky S., 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, 19
- Wünnemann K., Large meteorite impacts
- 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00695.x · DOI
- 10.1029/97JB03536 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- VERMEESCH, P. M., & MORGAN, J. V.
- Venue
- Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1019-1034
- ISSN
- 1086-9379
- 1945-5100
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review