Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chicxulub central crater structure: Initial results from physical property measurements and combined velocity and gravity modeling

VERMEESCH, P. M., MORGAN, J. V.·2004·Meteoritics & Planetary Science

Abstract

Abstract The Chicxulub crater in Mexico is a nearly pristine example of a large impact crater. Its slow burial has left the central impact basin intact, within which there is an apparently uneroded topographic peak ring. Its burial, however, means that we must rely on drill holes and geophysical data to interpret the crater form. Interpretations of crater structures using geophysical data are often guided by numerical modeling and observations at other large terrestrial craters. However, such endeavors are hindered by uncertainties in current numerical models and the lack of any obvious progressive change in structure with increasing crater size. For this reason, proposed structural models across Chicxulub remain divergent, particularly within the central crater region, where the deepest well is only ˜1.6 km deep. The shape and precise location of the stratigraphic uplift are disputed. The spatial extent and distribution of the allogenic impact breccias and melt rocks remain unknown, as do the lithological nature of the peak ring and the mechanism for its formation. The objective of our research is to provide a well‐constrained 3D structural and lithological model across the central region of the Chicxulub crater that is consistent with combined geophysical data sets and drill core samples. With this in mind, we present initial physical property measurements made on 18 core samples from the Yaxcopoil‐1 (Yax‐1) drill hole between 400 and 1500 m deep and present a new density model that is in agreement with both the 3D velocity and gravity data. Future collation of petrophysical and geochemical data from Yax‐1 core, as well as further seismic surveys and drilling, will allow us to calibrate our geophysical models—assigning a suite of physical properties to each lithology. An accurate 3D model of Chicxulub is critical to our understanding of large craters and to the constraining of the environmental effects of this impact.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb01127.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Alexopoulos J. S., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 29
  2. Anderson R. R., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 237
  3. Bell C., Stratigraphic and sedimentological observations from seismic data across the Chicxulub impact basin, Meteoritics & Planetary Science
  4. Camargo‐Zanoguera A., 1994, Evidencia sísmica del cráter impacto de Chicxulub, Boletín de la Asociación Mexicana de Geofísicos de Exploración, 34, 1
  5. 10.1190/1.1444455 · DOI
  6. 10.1190/1.9781560802624 · DOI
  7. 10.1130/0-8137-2339-6.291 · DOI
  8. 10.1029/2001JB000337 · DOI
  9. 10.1006/icar.2002.6822 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1029/2003EO140001 · DOI
  11. Deutsch A., 2004, Deep drilling in the Puchezh‐Katunki impact structure, Russia., 392
  12. 10.1016/S0032-0633(01)00005-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/0031-9201(95)03022-6 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1190/1.1440465 · DOI
  15. Gassmann F., 1951, Über die Elastizität Poröser Medien, Vierteljahrsschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 96, 1
  16. Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Multi‐ring basins, 37
  17. 10.1016/0040-1951(92)90152-V · DOI
  18. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.140.01.10 · DOI
  19. Grieve R. A. F., 1999, Encyclopedia of the solar system, 845
  20. 10.1146/annurev.earth.28.1.305 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00336.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.140.01.12 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ivanov B. A., 1994, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution, 81
  24. 10.1130/0-8137-2356-6.619 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/BFb0027764 · DOI
  26. Kenkmann T., 2004, Structure and impact indicators of the Cretaceous sequence of the ICDP drill core Yaxcopoil‐1, Chicxulub impact crater, Mexico, Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb01129.x · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0148-9062(97)00331-8 · DOI
  28. 10.1190/1.1451700 · DOI
  29. Ludwig W. J., 1979, The Sea, 53
  30. Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact cratering: A geologic process., 245
  31. 10.1146/annurev.earth.27.1.385 · DOI
  32. Morgan, J. V., Warner M., The Chicxulub Working Group, 1997, Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater, Nature, 390, 472, 10.1038/37291 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1130/0091-7613(1999)027<0407:CTTDOA>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00307-1 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S0040-1951(02)00143-9 · DOI
  36. Morgan J. V., 2002, Catastrophic events and mass extinctions: Impact and beyond, 39
  37. 10.1029/1998JE000596 · DOI
  38. OstermannM.1996.Die Geochemie der Impaktschmelzdecke (Sudbury igneous complex) im Multiring‐Becken Sudbury.Ph.D. thesis University of Munster Munster Germany.
  39. Picket G. R., 1963, Acoustic character logs and their applications in formation evaluation, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 15, 659, 10.2118/452-PA · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00263-5 · DOI
  41. 10.1029/JB088iB03p02500 · DOI
  42. 10.1029/94JE01089 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Poag C. W., 2004, The Cheaspeake Bay crater—Geology and geophysics of a late Eocene submarine impact structure., 522
  44. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2004.tb00052.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. Pösges G., 1994, Das Rieskrater‐Museum Nördlingen, Akademiebericht Nr. 253 Bayerische Akademie für Lehrerfortbildung Dillingen.
  46. 10.1190/1.1444249 · DOI
  47. Smit J., 2004, Is the transition impact to post‐impact rock complete? Some remarks based on XRF scanning, electron microbe, and thin section analyses of the Yaxcopoil‐1 core in the Chicxulub crater, Meteoritics & Planetary Science.
  48. Sharpton V. L., 1996, The Cretaceous‐Tertiary event and other catastrophes in Earth history, 55
  49. 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00255.x · DOI
  50. Tsikalas F., 1998, The anatomy of the buried complex impact structure: The Mjølnir structure, Barents Sea, Journal of Geophysical Research, 107, 30469, 10.1029/97JB03389 · DOI
  51. 10.1029/96GL01566 · DOI
  52. Visnevsky S., 1999, Large meteorite impacts and planetary evolution II, 19
  53. Wünnemann K., Large meteorite impacts
  54. 10.1046/j.1365-246X.1998.00695.x · DOI
  55. 10.1029/97JB03536 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
VERMEESCH, P. M., & MORGAN, J. V.
Venue
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
1019-1034
ISSN
  • 1086-9379
  • 1945-5100
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review