The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does tiger shark predation risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at multiple spatial scales?
Abstract
Prey availability and predation risk are important determinants of habitat use, but their importance may vary across spatial scales. In many marine systems, predator and prey distributions covary at large spatial scales, but do no coincide at small spatial scales. We investigated the influences of prey abundance and tiger shark ( Galeocerdo cuvier ) predation risk on Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphin ( Tursiops aduncus ) habitat use across multiple spatial scales, in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Dolphins were distributed between deep and shallow habitats and across microhabitats within patches approximately proportional to prey density when shark abundance was low. When shark abundance was high, foraging dolphins greatly reduced their use of dangerous, but productive, shallow patches relative to safer deep ones. Also, dolphins reduced their use of interior portions of shallow patches relative to their edges, which have higher predator density but lower intrinsic risk (i.e. a higher probability of escape in an encounter situation). These results suggest that predation risk and prey availability influence dolphin habitat use at multiple spatial scales, but intrinsic habitat risk, and not just predator encounter rate, is important in shaping dolphin space use decisions. Therefore, studies of habitat use at multiple spatial scales can benefit from integrating data on prey availability and the subcomponents of predation risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FOOD AVAILABILITY AND TIGER SHARK PREDATION RISK INFLUENCE BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN HABITAT USE
Heithaus, M. R., & Dill, L. M. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0480:faatsp]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 544
Self-citation
Cited by
Predator interactions, mesopredator release and biodiversity conservation.
Ritchie, E. G., & Johnson, C. N. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01347.x · Cited by 1,375
Sizing up the ecological role of sharks as predators
Heupel, M., Knip, D., Simpfendorfer, C., & Dulvy, N. (2014) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10597 · Cited by 332
Creel, S., Schuette, P., & Christianson, D. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru050 · Cited by 330
Heithaus, M. R., Wirsing, A. J., Burkholder, D., Thomson, J., & Dill, L. M. (2009) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01512.x · Cited by 239
Lourenço, R., Penteriani, V., Rabaça, J. E., & Korpimäki, E. (2014) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12054 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- R. Heithaus, M., & M. Dill, L.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-18
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 257-264
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2161511800
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does tiger shark predation risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at multiple spatial scales? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14443.x
- The paper
- R. Heithaus, M., & M. Dill, L. (2006). Does tiger shark predation risk influence foraging habitat use by bottlenose dolphins at multiple spatial scales? Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14443.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.